# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0120
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0120?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 40, page id 1672256038:0120
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=120
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000120.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 41 lines, status machine
# Lines: 41 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

D16F. L. 8FC2. lV
PA R A CR A PHTYS TERITTYS.
TEac distinctione conciliantur Doctores.
Ac distinctione semel constimuta, Facilis est concordia
L LDoctorum, quibus ea, de rericas masis cordi est, quam
Pheophilo discordiarum et mendaciorum miro artifici: nec
minus obnia est defensio Decretorum Clementis e PauliPon.
titicum, aut responsio ad aroumenta, qua in Thomictas con-
serir. Forum discrimen inter Suarem de Clementem, aue
inter Thomistas et Recentiores in hoc sirum est, quod in di-
versSe quatuor locis reponant calum morituri, cuius graria
adeoaerem licem, Theophilus monet Thomiltis. Suares, e
alii maceriam huius sacramenei exprectione voci confectionis
aut contritionis, nullo peccato expresse distincto, siue per lic-
ceras, sive proprio, aur alieno celtimonio hac, primo aur le-
cundo genere locant, id est volunt materiam omnino certam
e convenientem, ad minus, l necesicas exisar. Thomistae
vero ad certium aut quarcum genus reuocant, id elt, volunt,
aut nullam esse, aut summe dubiam, ec Facere, rel irritum, vel
InCerEUm SaCraMenEUM.
Ouid ad ilta Clemens VTTT. e Paulus V. damnane sen.
tentiam Suaris, qua maceriam incertam pro certa ponit,
Thomictarum sententiam non improbane, sed porius ad
rlum renocant, iuxra illam regulam, quae dubia materia, vel
Formâ rei praecipit ad arcendum Caluris periculum. Reque hoc
ruum probant, si quid probant arsumenea, quae conserie
Theophilus. Peaecipiune, inquie, Concilia, Ponritices, Rituale
Romanum impertiri absolutionem Sacramentalem moritu-
ro, nullum peccacum confesso, sed contritionem, ee vocum
confectionis peae se ferenti; ergo omnibus his repugnant
Thomista, qui nesant, hanc materiam sufticere ad ablolu-
cionem. Dato Ancecedenre ( de quo infra) Nego conse-
quentiam: quia Cummi Poncitices aut Concilia Catuunt ca
occatione impertiendam ab lolutionem re dubiam, sed ratione
Periculi auerrendi necellariam: quo verbo cadune, aut irrica
unt omnia Theophili arsumenta, qua hanc relponsionem,
quam Forre iple non praeuiderat, intactam omnino relin-
quunc. Sed Inctabis a me contictas esseillas Suarist, ec Tho.
mistarum, diversas clasles, materia sacramenti Ponitentix;
quo enim Fundamento altero Suarem repoluisse hanc mare-
riam primo, auc secundo L0c0, et et de cansâ divexlum a