# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0122
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0122?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 42, page id 1672256038:0122
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=122
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000122.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DESP. I. SECF. IV
virtualem; ad illud rero sutsiciat roluncas tacita, quam in-
rerprecatiuam rocane, qua nulli rnquam deest nis reprobo e
Tua damnationis, quam Caluris Audiolori. Sed ad Bapris.
mum. Exrremam- rictionem, Fuchariltiam, de alia denique
Peaeter Panicentiam, ex Matrimonium, Sacramenta conf.
cienda, Patis est professio rita Chriltiana: Sc ideo moricuris
conterri Polene, Baprilmus e Extrema-rnctio, si adsic prae-
Tumprio ea Sacramenta non reculaturos. Fodem fere loco.
videtur Theophitus relle, aut cerre debet Paenitentixe Sacra-
mencum reponere; cum camen plurimum ab illis dister. Ex
quo sic porest contici ralidum argueneum, quo FOta COn
eroversia dirimatur. Sacramento Poenicentix nequir lua in
ceoritas, aur essentia constare, (i delic illi partium eslentia-
lium rila, quales lunt confessio, e contritio aliquo siono er-
prella; atqui morituro, qui contellarium periie, ec lionum
aliquod edidir rori confectionis, e doloris de Peccato, seu
junctim, sinc disjunctim, delunc, quae ad essentiales Sacra-
menti partes pertinene; ergo ablolurio qua illi impendetur,
nulla erie, aucmaxime dubia. Minor propolicio probatur in
primis, si sionum tancum edidic rori confectionis, non po-
restillud ricem habere confestionis, et mulco minus contri-
tionis: nam voluntas confestionis non est contoltio, et mul-
eo minus contritio.
Dices esse confestionem ee dolorem de peccaris rirtualiter,
e quali interprecatiue, ee quadam iuris fctione; led ralde
rimendum est, ne huiusmodi distinctionibus, auc peaesum-
prionibus Falsum ex illicicum sacrameneum administretur,
Vnde enim scimus, insticutionem Christi, quae non minue
vera confestione; e resipilcentia, quam absolutione, Sacra-
mencum istud componit, constare, posse rirrmali auE PEx
sumpea contestione d Contritione: FF Si Pemel locus detur
huiusmodi distinctionibus, quae plurium pruriginem inse
niorum Fonene, nihil cerci supererit in re lacramentaria; po-
rerit quis perinde morituro impendere absolurionem, ae
Baprilmum e alia Sacramenea, acque eo tandem rem dedur
rerume luis Thesibus Viennae Theolosi Socieratis.