# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0124
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0124?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 44, page id 1672256038:0124
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=124
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000124.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 40 lines, status machine
# Lines: 40 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

15P, L. DFCT. IV
illud sic, quod ceprehenderunt Pontitices in Suare, cuius cau-
sa roluei abraus ante icespretationem ex eius scripris;
Varii, rarie explicane, quorum dicta capice umo letell
Theophilus, hoc maxime argumento, quod Suares nihil
aliud statuat, quam quae censuerunt Conciliâ, Poncitices, Ri
cuale Romanum: nempe absoluendum esse xorum, qui absen-
ei Cacerdori per litreras aut per nuntium peccaca aperuie, aue
rocum poenicendi: vel qui ad (une aoro, Pacerdori adue
nienti restantur, ancequam rox illum ec sensus deticerent, de
Deccatis doluisse. _ Contellarii copiam opralse habere: quid
vero mali habet sententia illa à eor Conciliis de Ponciticibus
comprobata, communi Theologorum consenu recepta,
Praecer Thomictas, quibus masis displicee, odio in Peluictas,
quam sudio veritaris. Cerre si id tantum quod obcendie
Theophilus, haberet incerpreratio suaris, Poncificum Cen
Cura Suaciintentata, in iplorum capue recideret. Non ita
CCNCEHE pEaTeF Thomictas oineS ReCeNtIORUI eE exEraneO.
rum Tustrissimus Cardinalis de Lugo Auerla d alii, quimi-
nus periculi subesse putant; si Suares peccauerit, quam si duo
Cummi Pontisces, in eo norando aberraverint; led (quae in
Pontificum sratiam dicunt) nos occupanimus, rel ralidion
Theophilo obiicimus, quae nequear infrinsere.
P AR A GR A DHYS V LZPMYS.
Variae Theclocorum interprecationes es verior Decrett
Pontifici.
E Lugo distinsuie duplicem confectionem vnam Aricte
cumpram, qua sic iudicialis exposicio culparum Facta à
reoapud lacerdorem in hac causa Iudicem: alteram quali ex-
craiudicialem, sicam in voluntare contirendi lua peccata, qua-
lem CeNSCFCTE FaCerC reUS, Si norarium aduocareE, ve Ccripto
obstringeret se ad criminis confestionem animo deltinaram.
Voluncicaque hi Auchores Clementem de priore confessione
lognutum, Suarem de Posteriore, quam inquir Auersa existi-
mabar, passim licicam; Poncifex vero negabarticere nisine-
cesticas summarrgerer. Sed graris (inquie Pheophilus)
comminiscuntur, eam dissentionem hi Theologiinter Pon-
tificem ec Suarem; cum reerque admirtae exeraordinariam
allicicam esse, nis eam exculer aux extorqueat orauis necesti-
Theophili, Baii aliorumque demonstranimus. Ouid vero