# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0130
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0130?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 50, page id 1672256038:0130
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=130
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000130.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DTSP. I. SECF. IV.
non est, ad minus non certa, sed summe dubia ea absolurio;
quam rult Theophilus nos impertiri his, qui incertam om-
nino materiam praebent. Sed dehis latis. Capite sexto
Mulcis regee argumencum ex Ricuali Romano (quod
Peaecipit absolui moriturum) si aliquo nueu vel cestimonio
altantium compertum sic Sacerdori, illum suorum peccaro-
rum poenitere, aut relle consiteri. Sed iam responsum ett,
adhibendam absolutionem dubiam, quam latis exculat ne-
cestitas. Acque hoc rno verbonos exoluimus ab omnibus
aroumentis quibus reset aliquos Thomictarum, quibus vi
Cum est, alicer respondere; neque Aidem astruimus aut ab.
negamus historia Complurensis dispurationis Theologum
Carmelicanum inter eDominicanum quam Romam rlque
deduxerune, ac rario euentu prolecuri unt, quorum om
nium fides sic penes Theophilum cxregium scilicet menda-
ciorum artificem: _ lua linceritatis latis, luculentum arou-
mentum prabet alluca relationi, calumnia in Colmam Mo.
relles, quem licentia plusquam Poé̈tica dicit corrupisse lo-
cum Diui Thoma ex primo Sentent. distinctione 42.
P A R A OR A PAYS SECYNDYS.
Calumnia Theophili in Dominicanos, praesertim
in Morelles e Graminam,  in
Clementem VI
On est passus Theophilus, nos dubitare hanc disser.
Lcarionem ab eadem ofticina prodiissé, à qua libellus de
immunitate eyriacorum in lucem renic; quia rerumque
opus iidem calumniis in Dominicanos inferciuit. Verobi.
que enim reteruntur miracula apud Bernenles Contra COn-
ceptionem immaculatam, dt Romx P. Lemos supersticis,
autmortui, ee Pii V. a Dominicanis conticta, quae iam in
ipsius Auchoris dedecus retorra sunc. Alias minutiores ca-
lumnias toro opere resperlas omietimus; contenti duas ape-
rire, ruam iam insinvaram in Morelles, alteram in Gra-
minam, quas eodem animo, infenso Dominicanis parturi
nic; sed rariis arribus ita interpolauit, re camen semper
idem consilium agnolcas. Mirum est lanc, quod cum rbi
que in Dominicanorum laplus accuratistime inquirat, pa-
macus Luata dalis entia AC a HObIS, deAdCTAII. COAQNCLITL