# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0137
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0137?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 57, page id 1672256038:0137
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=137
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000137.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DE VSY PROBABTET SACRAM.
ARTTCVLVS VETTMYS.
Pexeposterum Theophili iudicium.
De Catechismo, es de Rituali Romano.
Vaxror promileram me ex Theophili dissertatio
ne, caltisatione digna excerprurum. Prium iam Aidem
absolui: superest postremum, quo exercitationem claudam,
nempe iniquistimum de Catechismo Romano cum Rituali
collaco Tudicium. Licer ea singularis, quam defendendo de-
creco Pauli V. contra Interprerationem suaris e Theophili
argutias inivimus, ria ee methodus, ita in FUTO PONatCaU-
Cam nostram, rene rerbo quidem, de Forte, nec cogitatio-
neillam Theophilus artiserit, nec rilis argumentorum ma-
chinis labetactare posset: tamen cum plerique T homicta
rum, aliam centauerine riam paulo difficiliorem, pucaui
mei esse ofticii illorum detentionem aduertus Theophilum
suscipere. Veset maxime Choquetium ex Rimali ROma-
no, quod jubet ablolui moribundum, qui dum lui compos
erat, relminimum doloris ediderit Puorum signum pecca.
corum, auc roluncarem conticendi: ad illud aroumentum
respondet in primis Choguerius, huiusmodi Ricuale OpuS
elle, privari Doctoris operd contectum, nec illius authori-
tarem excedere; ee guamuis justu Pontificis fuerie conseri-
Drum, auc cuulgatum, nullam illinouam authoritatem ac-
cedere, sive quod non praecellerit Terium Pheolonorum exa-
men, sure quod Poncisex propter priuatam Ricualis opinion
nem, nolit quidquam derogari praeconcepris Theologorunn
opinionibus. Contirmat luam respontionem Choquerius
aduerlariorum Judicio de Cacechilino Pridentino, quenn
licer Concilii Occumenici jussu editum, Pii V. authoritate
munitum, rolune (ex hoc lua relponsione contirmat Theo-
Philus) ab ruo Ordinis Praedicatorum confectum, nec ex=
cedereauthoricarem Doctoris priuari, ec non Cemel esse hal-
sucinatum: quia Auchor ille, dum nimium indulget priua-
ns luorum sencenriis, non pauca in illud ineruie ODUS, Qua
merito non probantur omnibus, re quod de concurtu Det,
imo praecursu cradit, exponens primum Symboli Arriculun
NUMeTO 2.
AmplISimUS LIC CAMPUS SC APETIE ZA NOULML CCTEAIXCM