# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0149
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0149?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 69, page id 1672256038:0149
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=149
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000149.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DE VSV PRODABTLET. Ex SS. PATRFD. 69
nicaris sudiolos, ec in nouos Scriptores, in nona placita
seafrectos prodant, rel etiam rideri reline. Sane pax CraE
Caramuelem aequius ferre, se luique similes a Faonano NO-
vatores dici; quando quidem ita depercunt nonitatemr, de
conrramonitum Lirinen(IS, non solum noue. Ced eriam no-
na dicunt. Mirum est adeo abhorrere a nomine NOvatO
ris seu Nouitatis, ee rei ipsius ardenrissimo affectu AagFa-
re Videtur Carammelis animus indolem resipere De-
mophontis praefecti domus Alexandei Magni, de quo se-
runt ad rmbram incalescere, ad Solem ardentissimum Fri-
sere solitum: ita enim ipse aestuat, e aegerrime Fert d D.
Faenanonom en à nouitare impolitum, quam tamen de-
pereat. Fgo notim illi dare vilam expoltulandi causam
quali Nouatorem eraducam. Ouxcunque reculi ex Parri-
bus e Haereticis, bene aut secus Facta dictaque, mihi ad
caurelam assumpsi, aliis ad remedium, nulsis, nec aduer-
Pariis ad reprehientionem; quasi propius ab Tlareticorum
quam 55. Parrum restisiis e imicarione absint.
Sed siliceat controverliam nostram metiri ipssinet Ca.
ramuelis principiis pro quibus adco acriter PugnaE, nempe
omnem probabile licitum esse; illud vero consticui rnius
auc alterius viri docerina ee inceoricatis fama praeltantis:
Cane probatilissimum erie, hoc arbirrario probabilicatum
vu nupex indUCtO PEXTEE AUE FOTEC, CONEFA SS. PatTuM
mentem, qui cacent ommino ex Scubrochio, de ex aliis
seclamane, illius authores commereri quidquid Contra
prophanas vocum nonitares dictum est: quandoquidem
viri lapientissimi ita censent; Fagnanus, Sinnichius, e to
ea Academia Louaniensis, ex qua nullus PrOFCNTOT Cara-
invelis Theoloriam primum Fouanii editam probare von
luit, reretere Sinnichius 5. 470. Quod omnes suspectam ha-
berent nonicaris, ex concemptus antiquitaris compercam.
Ergo probabilis opinio est, in illam cadere quacunque col.
legimus de amore Nonitatis e naulea Antiquiraris, aque
ex reroque capice, insentibus malis se periculis esse obno-
XIAM.
Dices illos omnes Carammelis acculatores Tansenismo
taborare, ac proinde privandos jure nouas opiniones turas
e probabiles condendi. Ouid si reponamus magis illos a
tansenilino, quam qui acculane à Polycheilmo( quem pro-
babilem admierune) abesse. Nullus erir Ainis acculation