# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0167 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0167?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 87, page id 1672256038:0167 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=167 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000167.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine # Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.92 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. RRESTRTOTIONES MENTALES THEOPU. 8X encales semoras a circumstantiis quae illis sune reluri la cocommentarii (re de Christodiximus) aliqua causa pol se honectari, quod prima nostri argumenti proposicione alerimus. Vnde ad illius reritarem demonstrandam con- ferunt quae tradic Sinnichius toro capire T2T. quae nos di- Stinguemus diversis probationibus, quarum prima ad ho- minem ex Theophilo insinuara est. Ipse Cui libri cap. 2. nOt audecPlaronem aliolq. Philosophos pursare ab ilto errore, quod docuerint mendacium incerdum licere: Et quamuis Deoindecens, e inurile sic, hoimibuSLAMIeN PUTaNEPTO desse, ee corri posle tanquam condimento, emedicamento quo peritisec doctis rei liceat, non imprudencibus, sicur me- dicamentoru rus convenit medicisec aliis prohibendus est. Acque hanc ex Platone doctrina Diuus Tlierongmus (lib. 10 contra RuHF. CaP. 4.) cestatur le legisse lib. 6. Scromatum Origenis, iplum Faceri à Platone haultam, et à (e approba- cam, de inde Flieronrmus libra r. concra Rutinum dicie concra Origenictas, mendaciorum orgiis inter le Faedera- 105. Contirmacur eadlem prapolitio aliis ex Antiguitate celtimoriis; nam Sixtus Senensis libro s. Bibliochecae an nOT. 89. X 207. Obseruat huic Origenis opinioni Favere Cherloctomum (hom. 33. in Cenel. _ lib. F. de Sacerd. ) Hlieronrmus epistola 89. dicir se eandem doctrinam retu- lisse ex sex Scriptoribus Craecis cui primum risus Fuerar ad- haesisse, sed dispucatione cum Augustino convictus, cam abjecir. Ita enim habet, ex quo ostendi, menon ex definito id desendere quod in Gracis leseram (nempe reprehensum a Paulo Petrum piâ simulatione, Calurari et honestâ dis penlatione, relisiosa circumventione e aconomid, licet nihil DeccaHeE PCrruS) sed ea expreßisse quae leseram, ut Lectoris arbitrio relinquerem vtrum probandu essent, an improbanda C atranS COllatione Y5. SeCUTUS OpIMIONeM Origenis, ee Forre Diui Chryloltomi Cui praeceptoris, seri- bit taliter de mendacio sentiendum, atque ita eo otendum esse, quass. natura ei insit Flleboriimminente exitiali mor- b0 salubre: caeterum absque summi discriminis necessitate perceptum, praesentis esse exiri. Et ideo capire 20. illius Collationis vocac, Veilem (5. salubrem hypocrisim. d CaP. 28. Mennacium pio colore contectum. Tuam C astiani opinionem sicur Ruoultinus Flicronrmi, arguit Prolper libio contra Collatorem Cap. 20. Hac lege ac Resi a 80