# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0182 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0182?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 102, page id 1672256038:0182 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=182 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000182.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine # Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.89 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. 102 DFSP. IL. SFCF. L. illi Nominales alserune, et animus horret audire absolurd illa porestare mentiendi, seu ludendi aequinocationibus; ve nihil minus significatum roluerit, quam quem rerba Diaeferunt, ex cora Ecclelia accepir, e amplera est sen Tum: TTaec de prima dissertatione latis. d et et d et e sa esa e e 2( esa 2 23 2 2(3 es 2. Caset colet colet alet eled olet elet olet 6l d 1oled Din olet le ld blet DISEVTATIOSFEVND ApologericaPIO D. FaONaNO COntra Caramue lem _ P. MCTCOTO COntra AnOnYmuM. VPERTORL Dispuratione ridemur Prolusise huic secunda qua nOS ManCE, cum duobus acerrimis aduexlariis longe grauius certamen, quam cum Theophilo e Tamburino, quibulcum relitatione po- eius, quam iulto pralio hactenus puona- cum fuic; quod rrerque jejune adimodum, obiter aut porus concemprim controuertam de cutioris opinionis delectu actiserit. Pamburinus quidem suprare lacus, cum qui relictâ cura, probabiliore; communiore opinione, etiam in arriculo morris, operatur ex omnium renuissima probabilicare, nihil mali se periculi incurrere, recteoperari, ita certum asserit, ita a Doctoribus compro- barum, oc ejus discussione non indisear. Proinde cum alieno labore fundamenta sux doctrina jecerit, de d Peaecipuo controuersix capire abstinverie, nihil fere nobis Facelsuie negorii; sed rem nostram promouic incredibili- bus laxicaribus, quas collesisse rnus labor fuit: nam re- Ferre returare eAt. Nec operolius hoc argumentum Theo- Philus cractauit: nam fere pro comperto ee contelso apud omnes poluit, rnum Suarem, rel quemlibet alium D0- ctorem Classicum, posse conciliare probabilitatem secu- ram Cua opinioni, aliis omnibus reclamantibus, nulla ex- ceptione admilsâ; venihil curauerie, aue opus esse credi- derit, hanc auchoricatem nuperis Doctoribus aliqua pro- barione asferere. Quare Facilis et expedira puena (vic cum meeoose