# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0202
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0202?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 122, page id 1672256038:0202
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=202
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000202.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DFSP. LL SFCL. 1.
nox atrisisse, sed p am tractaturum: ad quid
igitur icerala amen aeculacio, ex ad illam contirman-
dam cor recentiorum testimonia, si hactenus nihil dictum
de quaestione, sed tancum promilta illius cractatio: Ica
esse lubens agnolco; quia licer plura per criginta pasinas
conresta sint, nihil camen ad rem pertinebant. Nunc cau-
eius de accuratius sibi agendum putac, de primum Catuen-
dam veritarem de ipsa probabilicatis ratione; re ad illam
quasi ad certam regulam expendatur, quid bene, quid se
cus scripserit D. Fagnanus, et quid cum sentire opoerue.
sit; neque enim horum quidquam, nec quo ab aliis diffe.
cat, nec quid impuonet, Cciri porelt, nili doctrina pramit.
EatuT, quam communem quoad substantiam allerie. Sed
non facile concedam concepeum probabilicaris ab illo
nonem Theoremacibus explicatumr, esse genvinum X Com.
munem omnibus: imo hinc omnium discordiarum origo
repetitur, quod malerem dubiam à probabili distinguat,
hoc discrimine gratis conticto, rem dubiam leur raito-
ne probabilem vero erani argimento, vel authoritate
niti.
Theoremare primo duo rerum genera distinguie, quae-
dam sunt per Ce norx nobis, relad sensum, vel exiplono
minissionilicacu: alix vero, de quibus elEFOFA CONFrOUer.
Ta, occultiores (une, e nobis ionora prortus, nih me-
diis quibusdam ad illarum nocicians deducamur: vel ergo
nullum ad id supperie mediumr, vel leve, vel grave non
convincens, Ced inclinans ad astensum, vel enidens ec de-
monstrariuum, sihoc postremum adhc, Paric certam de
euidencem rei nociciam: Si nullum vel lene argumentum
Tuppetat (quod Caramveli idem est) rem rocat negati.
ec, ee positine dubiam, eo dicerem rem omnino igno-
cam, si omne medium delic, si leue occurrar, dubitationi,
auc Cuspicioni parere. Si granis (uppetar rario quaecunque
candem sc, Ceu nullas, seu plures habeat etiam graviores
quibus impuonecur rationes, rocat probabilem; de hanc
Conqueritur a D. Fagnaso contundicum re dubiâ, de rulc
hocnomine distinsui, quod probabilis opinio ad conscien.
eia secaritarem sufficiat, minime vero dubia. Sed praeta-
tione ad has dislercationes morales probarum est, ec pluri
bus infra demonstrabitur, rem cum maxime dubiam, cum
rerinque grauissimis ee paribus rationum momentis ani.