# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0211
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0211?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 131, page id 1672256038:0211
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=211
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000211.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

FXAMEN TII. EPTSF. CARAM
Teu veritatem; formalem vnam rocar, alterum objectinam
istam negar cuilibet opinioni probabili, illam concedite
quali relic omne genus mali et peccari subesse poste rei de
qua disputamus, ec actioni quae instar asenda; ve rerbi
oraria juramento cum restrictionibus mentalibus de re
Falsa praetes audientismencem, de InterrOgantS expecta-
tionem; sed beneticio regularum probabilicars, polle nos
in mediis Cordibus munditiam, inter pericula granissima,
securitatem e tranquillitarem seruare; e dum Talutem do-
cernos comparare ipsistimis mediis, quae Forte mala TunE
eopportuna ad damnationem, Colertiam medicorum imi
tatur, qui remedia conticlunt ex rebus qua lua indole
lunt renena; nam iple, aliique probabilitatis paeroni, non
negant rebus inesse objectiuam rerocant Cormidinem, Fal.
sitarem maliciam; ec Forre juramentum Falhcum, restri-
ctionibus peccatum esse: led omne periculum, omnem-
que maculam ablteroi certicudine de veritate formali.
Flanc (inquic) distinctionem primx conturx Theologis
nocam, apud Canonictas non audiuit D. Fagnanus, ideo-
que ex ignorantia confundie cercicudinem objectiuam
cum formali. Sed non adeo impericus est D. Fagnanus
rerum, ne dicam Theologicarum, sed Elementorum Phi
lolophia, veienoret diltinctionem qua ad omnium scien-
ciarum partes perrincat. Duis enim Tyro Philo(ophix, qui
summulas Logica acrisie, ignorat dictinctionem rocum,
conceptuum, de subinde rericatis de bonicaris in objecti-
uam e Formalem. Sed id nobis ignorantix prodigium cst,
auc remeritaris, dari reritarem aut Fallicarem, cerricudi-
nemque, cui nulla objectina respondeat. HIOCnC Deo
quidem concessum est, re scientiam habeat rei non sci-
bilis; id est reritatem Formalem rei quae objectiua carcat.
Hociplum, quod millies repetir exemplum Conceptionis
immaculara, ejus assertionem euerrit. Mirum est rirum
cerre subtilem de cruditum non aduerrere Tuorum argu-
mentorum ricium; e dum de probabilibus agit, non di-
linguere propoltionem absolutam (Deipara Conceprion
nem credo immaculatam) et a modalis probabilis estC on
ceptio immaculaca) e verique luam certicudinem ineste,
cum objectiuam, cum Formalem rei accommodatam, quae
camen coro genere differant: ee rei probabilis absolurx
astentus sit Formidolotus, et obsourus, scur rei ipsius re-