# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0225 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0225?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 145, page id 1672256038:0225 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=225 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000225.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine # Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. OVATYOR REOVLE PROBABEE rix, cum post longum examen, nullius peccari mortalis cogicatio in mentem renit: damnatio rei, qui reltibus ac culantibus assensus elt, licer Forre caedio vitxe _ FOrMenTO- rummetu se falso accularit: quia hanc leuem conjectura non magis morari debet judex, ne damnet ad suppli- cium, quam Philosophus, ne sibi certo perluadeat honri- nem esse bipedem, quod nalei possint, e aliquando nari sint monopodes aut apodes. Fuc etiam Pertinet arou- mentum Scubrochii, de accedente ad lacram Synarim cum opinione conscientia a morcali labe pursatxe, quam- uis etiam ad cerriam regulam spectet, quo loco eadem distr cultas securret. Tertii denique generis opiniones pro babili Physico respondene, quas recentiores quoridie in- ducune: de quamuis pro libercare puonent contra legem e honestum, e vlero agnolcant polle esse fallas, nec min nus incertas, quam ACtrologoruin conclusiones, volune tamen curas esse, et ab omni periculo damnationis _ pcc- cari remotissimaS. Hac eriplici distinctione constitutâ, ralide infringie Mercorusprimum nodum Anourmi; qui Cune inquie illi qui jusum Christi gravanc, an illi qui plus aquo lenius volune, quos inter medius sedeas judex vel arbirer: Ad hec respondet insum conscientix e legis plusquam par (IC, GFa. vari a Merenda, quod ad honestarem actus requirat rectitu- dinem Logicam, laxari periculose conscientias, a recentio- ribus, qui concendant ad honeltarem actussufticere meram Probabilicatem Physicam, se media ec cura rid incedere, quia certicudinem Physicam ec probabilicarem Logicam requi- ric. Hac responsio solidissima ec iuxta subrilistima nodum Plane secac, controversiam dirimit, nec eget aliâ luce aue Probatione, quam acteneâ obseruatione e lectione co- tum quae iam dicta lune de triplicirerum certicudine (ub- jectae controuerliae accommodanda. Ad certiam regulam accedamus, omnium in hac re sravissimam, d cerrissi- mam, de qua nihil dubitat ipse Merenda omnium proba- bilicatum hostis infensissimus; eam rero astruimus, divi- sioni cerrix opinionum probabilium incer se puonantium quidem, led rerinque pro officio. Aroumenco sc Luperior regula de communicance ex opinione probabili (e Deo acceprum esse ex insoncem ab omni crimine lerhali. Pri- ma eriam dispucario de absolutione moribundi, et de ba