# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0231 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0231?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 151, page id 1672256038:0231 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=231 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000231.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine # Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.93 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. REFELLNAEVR NOVEM APPENDICES. Aimile, hominem subritissimum, qui a eoc annis huic con- eroversix de probabilicate, quali Prometheus C aucalo ad- harelcit, non capere, aut distimulare menrem noltram, à qua longistime recedir omnibus arsumentis quae fulissime e verbolistime prolequieur, quacuor prioribus Appendici- bus ad Epistolam quartam. Nemo Cane nisi huius controuersix ignarus porest dubitare, quin cora contineaeur regulis a nobis consti- curis. Sed nulla est in quam non impeserit srauiter ad. veclarius. Si meminisser prima, nempe hâc dispucarione de opinionum delectu, non agi de rebus qua ad speculan tionem pertinene, led rantum de agendis ec de moribus, abstinuisset à commemoratione decreri de Conceptione: qua est extra ambitum moralium quaectionum, et Adei subsellium, quae necellario credendis accendie nOn prO- babilibus, quorum numero aduerlarius accenser hanc quaectionem. Ergo nihil retert ad subjectat COntrOVeF- liam, etiamsi relis Adei mareriam complecti; sed de his su- perledeo, quia exera Thelim lunc, de Forre plura dicentur discuctione quartae Epistola. Si aduerlarius percepisser vim, de dimentus tuisset tertix reculx ambitum, ob seruaslet sine dubio dispenlationes Ponciticias a voco Colemni alia(que id genus exctusas esse a nostra dispucarione. Nam qual- cunque Colent concedere Pontitices, non erisunt ad Ca- ramuelis, aliorum que laxorum mencem, quali e duabus opinionibus, quarum vna Aerprolese, pro roro solem- ni, altera pro libertare, etiam (i paris sinc probabilitaris, se cundam anreponere licear prima. Sed id asuur lapientisi- mi Pontifices ex aliis regulis, maxime ex cercia nostra, cum eduobus malis, minus est elisendum: vel ex guarta quae permiteit ab opinione pro lese recedere, dispen- lanti rideatur esse renuistima probabilitaris, qua nequeat cum aduersa Centencia xquo iure contendere: haec dicta sinc obicer quia à dispenlationibus reperira objectio recur- Per Epilt. 4. Sed orauistime id que pluriesad MINAS FEF QUE GUaFeF I rltimam resula peccauit: _ quorquor in Appendicibus ha- bec in nos aroumenca, lunt mera Cophilmara et Falsi huins reoule sensus, que perinde Facessut nud a illius explicatione, Dum staruimus e purnacibus incer se opinionibus antepo- menda cum quaelesi laver, hoc illi jus asserimus non caciove iii