# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0235 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0235?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 155, page id 1672256038:0235 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=235 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000235.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine # Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. REFELEVHEVE TZ. APPENDTCES. iuxea mea principia dicam Deccare quidem, idque libere non necellario, quia ratione dubicationis a ce ipso insinua- cae, ionorantia invincibilis collitur, aue reloluitur in igno- rantiam vincibilem, rbi primum orcum est dubium, et cum invaluie in opinionem probabilem, ac proinde (c- quendam, quia stat prolese, huiulmodi iuramentum re- rum esse periurium. Ergo ex meis principiis ne rel mini- ma quidem suspicio est, me peccare necellario ex ignoran- tid inuincibili: quando quidem iplamet dubitario inonee ab actione suspecta abstinendum: C ur vero tu id Conten- dis. Nempe ex cua Fundamencali Theolosia, pugnancium incer se opinionum probabilium quamlibee cutam ese, etiam si ster prolibertare contra probabiliorem pro lese: haec tota cua eAt probario, idestnostra chelis, id est mani fecta pecicio principii. Prgo tela eAt aranearum cua argu- mentatio es non carena terrea, niss rece altiset de deliciat in hOrrendOS CFFOTCS. Sedincautu de praecipitem in nos xctu disputationis abri- pi rideo e in protundum omnium errorum delabi aduer- Parium, dum inuincibilem isnoranciam individuam rule esse omni probabilitari: quam sibi Foueam effodit, hoc alserto: in quae praecipitia deducir homines? certe quilquis negat ignoranciam inuincibilem polle colli aut relolui in ignorantiam vincibilem Pola sciencia rerum de quibus opi namur, iam pluries demonstraui quod inde idololatriam docertieri probabilem, acheismum securum, ee ab omni pe ticulo peccaci auc damnarionis immunem. Superioribus arcumentis hocnouum addo, Cionorancia invincibilis ne- quear rollinisi per Ccientiam rerum de quibus dubicamus immerica Apoltolus Romanorum primo inexculabiles pronunciat antiquos Philosophos, quod cum Dcum co- onovittene ex creaturis, ve Deum minimes coluerint, illique gracias egerine, re bonorum omnium Authori, primae lui, e rerum rniverti caula. Sed quos damnat A- postolus, abloluit Caramnel; contendo enim his Philolo- phis quosinexculabiles pronunciae Paulus, non defutu- ram ignoranciam inmincibilem, qua imbui rule ones opiniones probabiles, retuex Aane, ee ab omni peccato exculent, idque dosma Fidei purar, nec posle nesari linc aperto Lansenismo. Concra hane tundameneadem Theologiam, obseruan-