# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0246 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0246?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 166, page id 1672256038:0246 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=246 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000246.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine # Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.92 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. DESP. II. SECT. I1. rum respondeo quod alio loco dixi: Caramuelem in alie no oculo feltucam obleruare, nec in luo erabem seneire. NON iBNOTaED. FagnanuS AnalOGOLUM, Qua rOCANE ac- cributionis, cariones e leses, re plura idem nomen POr- eianeur ab rno quali fonte e capire, cui sic eximium et Si- gulare. Nihil opushrabemus doceri à Caramuele reritatem vni inesleindiciomentis, sicuc bonitarem autfni, auE ron luncatis affectibus, et Canirarem Colis animantibus conve- nire, e inde nomina reri, boni, sanique deducta illorum causis signisque actribui, Dialecticae Fyrones, non iono- rant a vericare Formali, quae insuc iudicio res dici, reras objectiue remensura, caulaque rera noctra cognitionis, propoltiones aucem seu roce, Peu seripto exprellas veras dici, quod meneis conceprum significent; cademlanalogid a Canitate e incolumitate corporis humani, Cana dicimus remedia, quod caulae sint lanitatis effectrices, Canam dici- mus crisiu, quod lanicarem pranunciet: eadem deriua- eione nominum a bonitare finis media propriae bonitaris racua, bona appellamus d bonicare Formali afectus; obje- eta bona cenlemus eodem plane sensu, quo remedia dixi- inus lana appellari. FTaec estmens D. Faenani; quid habee quod carpar Caramuel. sed Fallam acculationem reristimâ depulimus; ille paradoxonono honeltarem actus nOn (O. lum distinouie) à bonitare objectiua, sed quod inauditum elt apud omnes (nisforre apud Caluinictas, qui le priuaco Spiritu oloriantur credere quae rerbo Dei nullo aut Ccripto auc cradico exrane, id est se Formalem rericarem linc rila objectiuâ consecutos) Caramuel contendic honeltatem, rericarem que actus seu Formalem constitmendam, cui nul- la objectiua relpondear, ee hanc subrilicarem Scholasticam ricio rerrit Fagnano ignorasse: Led gloriari poller se id nescire quo rno Caluinista sele in omnium errorum rora- finem praecipices, _ tran (uersOS agUME. Sed esto vincant Theologi Canonictas, vincat Cara- nuel Fagnanum peritia rerum ee distinctionum Mecaphy. Sicarum; cedant illi omnes necesse est Pontificiarum con- sticutionum e disciplina Ecclehasticae scientia; vnde repe- cenda estrora haec controvertia; quis enim nelciat hic quasi Proram e puppim esse, has veriu sque iuris dignitares, pri- am in dubiis cuciorem partem esse elioendam, alteTaME vero qua nihil Frequentius iph rsurpane, de iure poriori 16