# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0258
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0258?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 178, page id 1672256038:0258
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=258
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000258.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

1020 22. dECI.El.
aequinocatione deceprilune, remonet Cardinalis de Luoo
dispuiatione 20. de Pider. nec aduerterunt, haec duo di-
versissima esle, credere conclusionem aliquam esse proba.
bilem, ex illi probabiliter assentiri, prima enim propositio
est modalis, secunda est de inelle, e qui proposirionem
incer probabiles accenset, porest contrariam probabilem
Iudicare, non tamen credir reram esse astensu probabili,
aliognin haberet assensus duos probabiles de objectis con-
eradictoriis: rnde nihil prohiber indicare veramque con-
tredictoriarum probabilem esse, seu probabilem videri, et
detendi probabiliter a luis authoribus. Sed ille lensus ad
hanc quaectionem nihil perrinec, qua id maxime inquirit,
an idem incellectus, pollit verique parri, simul assentiri re
verae, quod manilectam pexe se Ferr repugnantiam. Oux
nospaucis perstrinximus, D. Faonanus quae st. 2. Parte F.
Locupletauit canca vbertare doctrinae e subcilitare, re mi-
rum sic, Caramuelem illi obiicere insciriam rerum Theolo.
vicarum, cum hoc rno loco provocare possit subtilissimos
quolquo Philolophos ac Theoloeos: ex Aristorele rariis l0-
cis, probat differre judiciu de probabilitate, ee veritare opi.
nionu sibi concradicentium, quatuor porissimu differentiis,
quod iudicium de probabilicare sic enidens, de reritare sic
Formidolosum ex obscurum; illud quilquis habet etiam de
veraque contradictoria neurram sequi porest, aliud enim
cA, indicare verique parti vim inesse, qua possic ad sui aF.
Tensum deducereignarum, aliud reipsâ sinere se duci. Pri
mum significat, ve cum Capreolo loquar, simultarem Don
centia, impulsiux ad assensum, quam inesse cuique parri
quid recate Dari rero assensum de rericare veriulque parris,
Perinde repuonar, ac contradictoria simul esse rera, de a(.
sensum dissensumque, eadem de re junsi simultare actus.
Elinc aperir deceptionem illorum, qui haec duo indicia con-
fundune, ee ralide refelsit Sanchem, de Valquem, quo-
rum primus concendicassensum de veriu sque parris verita-
ce Formidolosum, per principia incrinseca admitri polle,
alter vero id nerac, licer concedar haberi posse per princi.
Dia extrinseca. Sed coresie Gregorius driminensis Pio-
Politiones contradictorias, non posse veras teri, etiam
a diversis cansis, inde probac, quod alias ero e ru efficere.
inus duo contradictoria esse rera, quod heri etiam a Deo
SCPUOMRE. Fxc omnia complexus est Aristoreles 2. de