# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0261
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0261?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 181, page id 1672256038:0261
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=261
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000261.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Y CYASS. ARO, IN DRTHOTB, SPNDERES. ICX
sunt aequalis probabilicaris: Hoc idem est ac iudicare
veram que parrem, non minus apparere veram quam tal-
Cam: nam qualibet ex (uo moriuo apparet reta, ec ex IMO.
riuo aduersae opinionis a que probabilis censerur eodem
sradu Falsa, quo rera. Atqui manifeste repugnat, altenti-
ei eidem propolitioni reverxe, ec ab illa dillentire eodem
certicudinis gradu, re a Falsa: ergo repuonar, assentiri
simul duabus propolitionibus paris probabilicatis: hoc
enim perinde elt ac Aiudex in causd, qua licigantes aequo
sure concendunt, in oratiam rnius, alcero damnaco iultam
ferret sententiam. Si iuca veriusque parcis sinc in hoc
Paria, re ambae habeant camdem rerisimilicudinem, cer-
ce incellectus qui Judicis loco sedet, male pronuntiabit,
rnam partem reriorem esse altera: aut quod decerius, re-
ram ruam, alteram dicar esse Fallam. HLoc idem contir-
mat, ac pene enincit exemplum Cacerx, cuius compara-
tionem ad incellectum immerico reijcir Spinula, de opei-
medetenditMercOruS. Sicut enim Carera dum rrgetur
Pondere rerique lanci appolito, non porest rim illius non
sentire aur contemnere; ita nec incellectus porelt dissimu-
lare rim argumentorum, quae verimque regent. Ilinc
etiam AE, re licur Ctarera, quamdiu destinetur ponderibus,
Paris gravicatis, in neutram partem rersat; ita nec in-
cellectus, quamdiu oppolitae opiniones, aequo marce pu-
Snane, porest se vili parri addicere. HIoc solum dilcrimen
est, inter Raceram inanimem de mentem liberam, quod
haec possie assencum cohibere a probabilibus; non tamen
rim aroumentorum contemnere, aue dissimulare: quibus
E der locum ad iudicium de ad examen, suspensus haerebie,
dum altera pars rincat, seu maiorem veri speciem praete-
eat. In hoc etiam intellectus ad exemplum propius acce-
dit, quod sicur Catera in xequilibrio polita, digico depresla
Sponteredie ad aegnitibrium; ita incellectus inter opiniones
Paris prohabilitaris posicus, haeret anceps; de si roluntate
in rnam propellatur, rim pacitur: nec Forte porestabillo
aguilibrio recedere, quam diu opiniones oppolitae pari pron
babilicare sibi rericarem, ex aduer(a parti Falscarem inelle
probant.
Nec ralet E dicas, posse roluntarem pro suo, relattectu,
vel imperio, intellectui praecipere altentum partis eeque,
surminus probabilis: quia imperium roluntatis in Cxete
M