# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0263 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0263?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 183, page id 1672256038:0263 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=263 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000263.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine # Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.93 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. accedit. Neque enim incellectus, in opinionum delectu, a voluncatis regulis in deligendis mediis, ret lacum rn- ouem recedie; ac proinde licur ex mente lancti Doctoris electio apperitus quamdam collationem iIMPOrEaL quare nus est acceprio rnius prae alterâ, quae nequir heri nisime- dio quod eligitur, maior insL auE certe apparCaE conve- nientia ad finem, maxime si efficaciter incendatur; ergo idem de incellectu sentiendum cum ctHCacitet vexitaten appetat, de in ea inquirendâ torus sc, arque ad eius conse- cutionem conferat probabilioribus adhaerere, ac proinde non porest, nisi rim sibi inferat, minus probabilia ancepo- nece. Sed, inquies, minus probabile collatione probabilio- ris non delinit esle probabile; ergo porese illi intellectus assentiri; deinde in hoc probabilia a necessariis differune, quod illorum non minus assensus, quam roluntacis dele- Ctus liberior Sic. Respondeo ad primum, has opiniones Probabiles dici, apricudine porius quam actu; quarenus Pollune ingenerare sui assensum intellectui, nisi probabi- lioris ec opposiexe assensu fuerie praepedicus, vel nis pares Probabilicare puonent, ee sibi sinc impedimento. Differe. autem probabilium se necellariorum astensus, quod iltio rbi lemel obiecta sunc animo, non postie non allentiri; à Probabilibus autem abstinere postic omnino: l aurem velie de illis opinari, non porest habere ita verlacilem altentum, rediserimen Racuar incer paria, vel minus probabilia an- EepONAE: IIIO (QUR CFAE FCFEIA CONEFOvCFSIX ParS) Si minus probabile rere probabile sic, collatum probabiliori srauia habeat rationum momenta, ec rno rerbo parum diltet à sradu probabiliori, ita Culpen Cum e ancipirem distincbie incellectum, re ipsa contempea nequeat adharere parti Pautulum probabiliori: acque hoc Forre discrimen in- tercedie incellectum incer de Rarera exemplum cories re- Peticum, quod cum huius xequilibrium indinisibile (IC, ret minimo millii grano apposico in eam partem veroat: ac Paulo lacior est incellectus dubii suspensio; experimur enim, incerdum nos haerere dubios, non solum pariainter verinque rationum momenta, quod raro contingie, cun eamen dubia sine Frequentissima: sed etiam cum par- res parum viribus aur probabilitare distant. Sed dices non ne poreltprobabilior elisi, cum connenientior rideacus ad veri consecurionem, sicur eadem de causs dictum est parcs: M in I CF AOSSLLRO. DA LRLACIB. SYNDERES. 15Z