# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0268
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0268?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 188, page id 1672256038:0268
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=268
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000268.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 40 lines, status machine
# Lines: 40 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

16P. Il. SFcT. II.
cur secundo superius argumentum: Si probabiliras rellexa
excluderet metum peccati, de Falsi, e periculum Caluris,
nullus rnquam peccaret, aut operaretur conscientid dubia,
consequens est aperre contra sentum Theologorum d
contra experientiam: sequela probatur, quia rix rnquam
animus hXFeE anCepS ee dubius, quin rerinque Occurrant
rationes probahiles; li erso ad evitanda dubixe conscienria
Deccaca, Patis sic refecti lupra cuiulque parris probabilita-
cem; cum ea refferio sit in prompeu de arbitraria, nullus
nisi ineptus aur impeudens laborabie aut peccabie con-
sciencia dubia, cum remedium sic ad manum, non minus
curum quam facile; ( Ades habenda sc aduerlariis; sed
Contra reclamar Sanctus Doctor quodlibeto nono art. 15.
rbi docet qualtionem de habendis pluribus praebendis
ab (que dispenlarione periculose decerminari; quia anceps
est, hinc, ee inde Theologix e Turis-consultis in diverlas
Partes abcuncibus. Ec s authoricari nolis acquielcere, rario
Periculum demonstrat. Exror nunquam exculatur nili ex
invincibili ignorantiâ, aut necesticare incuicabili; sed qui
dubius est, auc qui rni parri adhaeret, re aeque auc minus
contraria probabili, non laborat invincibili ignorancid,
cum dubius lc, neque rrgetur incuitabili necestitare; quia
Pocest abltinere ab operatione, Peu ab opinione qua favet
libertati, de sectari contrariam, quae legi de recticudini
apperitus conformior est. Contirmari porest idem arou-
mencum ricimo, ratione (xepils insinuata: non porest cer-
eo altentiri incellectus propositioni particulari; Mihi picto-
ri licet hoc dic festo pingere, E dubia cantum sic de proba-
bilis proposiciornivertalis, lscirus est pictura labor diebus
festis. Nec Paris est quod respondet Bardi: IIlam certitu-
dinem moralem conseare propositione singulari, dummo.
dd incellectus indicet certo propositionem rnivertalem
non carere probabilirate: laborat enim responsio aequino-
catione quam luperius deceximus; aliud enim est censere
veramque partem probabilem, cum quâ Ctat dubium de
veraque, aliud est adhaerere alreri parci probabiliter, quo
Coluitur animi dubii suspensio: ergo iudicium de probabi.
Licate reriusque rel alterius partis, non porelt conterre cet
cirudinem moralem necessariam ad honectatem opeiatier