# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0272 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0272?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 192, page id 1672256038:0272 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=272 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000272.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 40 lines, status machine # Lines: 40 recognised, mean confidence 0.93 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. DTSP. II. SECT. II. PA R A OR AP H VS V C FPMYS. Arbitrario probabilicatum delectui pro lbertate: repuonant Patres s Theologi, nec qu’equam favet recula in dubus standum pro jure possidentis. EED ve ab hoc poltremo incipiam recorqueri porest ar- Soumentum, minus esle rerisimile, cor Patres _ Theo. 10905 Antiquos Modernis nihilo interiores, ne dicam lan- aticare et scientia Cuperiores; candiu in contrariâ sencentia. id est in errore fuiste, quem a criginca cantum annis emen. darum rolune: Juis hoc credat: nec Ecclelia silencium _ colerantia hanc regulam certam Facie, quali probauerit, quod ab eius damnatione rideatur hactenus abstinuisle. Nam praeter quod Pralatorum plurimi reclamant, et s Concilium Occumenicum haberetur, credibile est damna- tionem non enaturum: Addune alii Eccleliam a censura abstinuisse, quod res dubia sic, de permirtaneur res dubixe Theolororum disputationibus. Vicimo tandem dici porest, quamcum que EccletiX to- lerantiam non probare mala qua lesi nacurali aduerlan- EuT: aeque his acculemus ictum probabilitatis rum. Nec verum est, quod primo argumenro obijciebatur, d erigin- ca annis esle comparatum jus Adelibus possessionis con- eralesem: quia nultus comparari porest ciculus à possel- Sione, nisi pacitica Fuerir: huiulmodi rero regulae seu posses- Toni plures Doctores incercesserunt. Respondent alii secundo, hanc juris regulam, quae vindicat rem possidenti, ralere rantum de rebus externis, quarum possessio ica definitur, est rei corporalis detentio. corporis ex animi iuri(que adminiculo: Immeriro aurem Sanches, Diana, _ paucissimi Theologi, contramentem religuorum Theologorum, de omnium consultorum juris. hanc reoulam ad alias rircures porrionne, quia pollestio in materia huicsmodi rircurum, nullam pexsumprionem re- ciratis ingerit in gratiam poltestoris, sieur in materia incti- eix, qui possider aliquod bonum externum FOFTUNX, Cen- secus re sua poriri e trui, nam qui rem luam abdicac, (0- ler cradere rero domino, in quem per huiusmodi abdica- tionem,