# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0276
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0276?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 196, page id 1672256038:0276
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=276
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000276.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

2136
DFSD. II. SECF: TII.
rixe ab illis addiex reltrictiones, a numero 354. DicerCB
hos omnes Auchores, nostro argumento impeticos eslé
veluci clastem riolenta cempestace dejectam, e conqual-
fatam, rel arcem cormentis bellicis labefactatam, e cuer-
Cam: rnde rim nostri Enchrmemaris Facile est colligere.
Licet vero dissentiane hi Theolosi; quoad antecedens;
nonnulli in torum negene, alii concedane, alii denique
varias apponant reltrictiones; omnes Fere camen negane
consequentiam, si dispucatio sic de actibus humanis, ex
Polo praecepro ad Calutem necessariis; nempe amouendo
Deccato, quod possit saluri esse impedimento; illud enim
collipurane, non Colum obedientia, qua lex impletur, led
etiam legisignorantia, aut probabili opinione, quae aliqua
ratione incertam Faciar lesem, ciulque rim putant nOI
Tolum intirmari; sed Omnno auterri, re nuIIUMT SIE PCCCALI
Periculum. Nos argumentis a lingulis officiorum antece
dens ltabiliemus, contra rum ettrenem probabilicatum,
_ ex ancecedenti contirmabimus conseguentiam, COntTA
exceptionem Suaris, e aliorum de rebus ex (olO PTXCE=
peo ad Calurem necellariiss
ARFZCVEVS PRTMYS.
Probatur delectus opinionis rutioris a Relig: osorum
Instiento.
ECESSE elt iudicium incipiat à domo Domini, pri
LN mum erso quo ancecedens probamus argumentum.
repetitur a religiolorum profestione. E Pranciseanis Pa-
eres sranissimi sux Caluris de perfectionis Audioliores, ra-
riis e orauibus dubiis, ex incerro Cua regulae sensu auxii
consuluerunt Clementem V. qui hac rna respontione co-
rum postularis Catistecit. in dubis ruriorem partem esse
elicendam. Acque hac rua lese consticura, ridetur omnes
difficultates prostisosle, quas probabilitatum parroni, ad
hranc regulam juris naturalis debilicandam, ac Pene COr-
rumpendam comminiscuntur. Ouid enim ineprius, aut
masis alienum a mence Pontiticis, quam quod dicune
nonnulli, hanc juris reculam, locum habere, cum dubium
tueric aequilibre (quod ferenunquam continsir) re inde