# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0281
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0281?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 201, page id 1672256038:0281
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=281
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000281.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

IL. C LA5S. ARO, A LFOF AMLCTZLA,
202
ARTTCYEVS SEOYHDYS.
De Religionis candidato e Christiano, in delectoe
eorum quae ad salucem credenda sunt,
Dosmatum.
PECYNDYM aroumentum reperimus a candidaco rerae
Oreligionis, auxio, et Cuspenso, in eligenda Ade, religio.
ne, aut Ecclesiâ, cui debeat, aut pollit, cuto adharere ad
Palurem comparandam. Pc contendimus post Chrylosto-
mum homilia 4. in Macth. _ D. Anoult. Cap. 8. lib. 2. de
Doctrina Christiana, sequendam religionem dignioren
Deo, perfectiorem, de quae denique granioribus, ec PrO-
babilioribus argumencis, muniatur. Hloc argumencum
Prolequitur MerCOTUS 2. ParrIS aFF. 22. & duobus seguen-
cibus. Ex probabilicacum parronis Spinula negac adhaeren-
dum dosmaci, et relisioni probabiliori, hoc vero conce-
dic Bardi, sed negac eandem caucelam adhibendam esse, in
delectu opinionis, quae ad MOreS PerrineE; tum quia Au-
gultinus illam exisic cancum in delectu religionis, cum
quia grauius impender periculum, si aberres a rera relioio-
ne, quam ab opinione de agendis. Sed contra elt aPCF-
ce Augultinus, qui exprelle asit, de his quae continene A.
dem, morelque rivendi; deinde eadem ratio, quae ad in-
icurionem religionis, et Adei, exisit, re curiora e PrO-
babiliora sectemur rim ec locum habet, in delectu opi-
nionum, qua ad mores pertinene: Ergo rbique, nuIla
excepeamateriâ, aur nullibi (quod impium de Pacrilesum
est) curiora sequenda TunE. Ancecedens probatur. Sicue
lege naturali praecipitur homini, ne se obiiciat periculo
aberrandi ab vlcimotine, e a vera relisione ad Palutem
necestaria; ita illi praeseripeum cst, ne subeat periculum
violandi amicitiam Dei, iura ipsius e Prxcepta quaecum
que: ersorbique, aur nullibi, acriora ee viciniora CaluLI
debet eligere. FTAIC FaTIONCML PEOSCGNIEUF MeTC. PaETIS 2.
art. 22. _c. Ilac regula Facillime detendi porest, non dari
ignoranciam invincibilem Dei, iuris naturalis eec. quia om-
nium hominum mencibus, innaca est nocio huiulinodire-
ricatum, quae ad minus, inseris dubirationem ee opinio: