# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0283 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0283?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 203, page id 1672256038:0283 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=283 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000283.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine # Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. RPFKLLVMEVE ARO. LABRTEE SIVDROOH. 202 mecanimus: erso omnino Fallum est, quod supponit ad- Merlarius; quasi rnicum Cui cractarus Fundamentum P. Fa- bri, certo probabile Facere cerrum prudentiae iudicium. Nec verius est, quod addic 2. quidquid speculariue proba- bile est, esserantum probabilicer probabile, si in rlum de praxim nequeat cuto rurpari. Alia est enim prorlus cau- Taprobabilis, e curx opinionis, haec pecitur ex eo, quod lonse absit a periculo violanda legis, ec dinina oftentionis, quod porese comperere opinioni minima aur nullius pro- Babilicatis, re cum quis sibi perluadet, se Peccare, A ac- cedat ad Sacramentum non perfecte concritus, vel l Pose Deccatum admissum conteri differat aliquo momento, hac opinio rurissima est e minus probabilis. Probabilicas re- roperitur e rarionum ri ex difficultarum quae rigene ad assensum rnius parris incerdum Falle, qualia Cunc argumen ta impiorum contra prouidenciam, et in multeria Adei, quae sunc tantum Epecularine probabiliora, quanto magis rrgent: hac ergo probabilitas, licer certo e cuidenter no- ca, periculosissima est, nec porelt. assentum exrorguere (- ne noxa Adei, de Paluris, ergo porest, cerro _ euidenter Probabile, este periculosum, ac proinde rixltare porelt, distinctio allaca, cui eora cractario de huius authoris pro- babilicare innitieur. Flinc etiam refellitur, quod stubrochius, noris ad nocas, in quintam Epiltolam de probabilitate refere, ex Sanctio e Flcobario infidelem cui proponicur nostra A des re maois credibilis, dum eius secta probabilicer ad- huc credibilis appareat, non reneri ad noltram hdem reci- piendam, exrra mortis arriculum. Sed hanc poltremane exceptionem, removene Sanctius e Diana efficacistimo ad hominem argumento, quod morris articulus, haud novam reculam operationum moralium inducat: de consequen- quencer afterunt, infidelem illum, nec in morris arriculo obligari ad credendum. Ad haec respondet Scubrochius im grariam Sanches, illum eo loci adductum, aliud nihil do- cere, nisi haerericum inculpabili ignoranciâ laborancem, non reneri mutare religionem. Sed difficultarem argu- menti dissimular aur eludit, rel male detendic dictum San- ches: IIIud enim quaerimus, an quisquis nabec aliquam probabilitarem licet muleis partibusminorem, ca qua illi attulser, ex Christiana ee Cacholica, posi illi PC LOCAM2