# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0289 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0289?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 209, page id 1672256038:0289 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=289 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000289.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine # Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.93 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. II. CLASS. ARO, A RELTO, CANDTDATO. 209 doctrina: quid vero aliud expectes, ab illo verlatili pro: Babilicaris ru, quam Academicorum in opinionum de lectu inconstantiam: Temerarius plane sic, et Seuere ca- Rigandus, qui exactâ ad has regulas Lesbias, cota vica, ad indicium Dei rocatus, rerbis Richardi se exculer, Domme si error est, arbitrarius probabilicatum rus pro commodo. contra probabiliorem à lege tua santem, a ce decepri su- mus. Timeo ne haec detensio reliquas rica peateriia cul- Pas, noua graniori cumularee _ augereL. Vanus omnino et Falsus ellem, si me paria in reuocan- dis ad fidem Hlxreticis, Facturum putarem cum Caramue- le, qui rriginca millibus Lucheranis Eccleha adjunctis, An. selis saudium peverit maximum, quandoquidem (uPer ruo peccarore dies in caelis Feltos de lolemnes agunt. Veinam pollem gloriari mea opera, erisinca aur deceim ab haeresi ab Ecclesiam rediisse, rerum s plus profecisse rlero aonolcam, forre non concedam, plus de diucius, quaminis Felicius melaborasse. In eo aurem genere Fcclesialtici u- neris ee dispurationum, quo riua roceregnare Caramue lem licet ex Fructibus coniicere, rimeo ne seripris CHexFaC quae concionibus aur colloquiis promoiie. Sane si obci- neat, quam rbique oberudit, altercio ad securitatem con- scientie, in mareria fidei, sufticere opinionem probabi- lem, non capio, qua rarione perluadeat haereticis, luos erroresabiicere, quos rix possit ica aperte retellere, quin ad minus aliqua illis supersit cernistima probabilicas, qua ex Tamburino securos Faciat sux Caluris, abjectâ opinione et Cubinde religione curiori, e probabiliori, etiam in arri- culo mortis. Ouamuisigime infiniris parcibus me Caramneliinferion rem agnoscam, in lacessendis, connerrendilque haerecicis, non dubico camen ine dispucandi methodum sequi curio- rem, ex lonse eficaciorem. VBi pTIMUI CONFFOVCKCIAS AE- rigi concionibus ad populum habiris in ciniratibus Callia harelinfectis, sensi oprandam rem, masis quam (peran- dam, posse omnem probabilicatis speciem eripi, erroribus corlibris, non mediocri eloguentia scripris, eor argumen- eis ed ricontortis, re quidam pucene, incerdum e nostris Doctores, ea debilius excipi d depelli. Teaque aliam iniui riam, ec arrem pugnandi, rudis adhuc huius dispuratio- nis de probabilicare, quam in Scholis, neC exCCPeTaML