# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0303
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0303?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 223, page id 1672256038:0303
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=303
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000303.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

A SCHOLARVH PROFESSORIBVS.
etiam, re alias obseruarum est, Scoici semonebane facul-
catem opinandi a Capience, quod Deo pene parem Face-
rene, nec parerentur obnoxium esse deceptioni, qua ne-
queac ita ab opinione semoueri; quin nesciens de impru-
dens, interdum Fallus sis; dum opinaris.
Sed praecer communem hunc omnibus opinionibus in
senicum defectum, aut periculum deceptionis ee Falsi; Opi-
niones rerum moralium, quae Hant Pro libertate contra
lesem, aliud habent ricium sinsulare; quo speculatiux
omnes, de morales eriam opiniones, pro lese pugnances
carene, nempe periculum mali e peccari, ne revera qui-
bus favent, actus, illegitimi ee lese prohibici sinc. Vnde
necessario consequitur (quamuis id negene Caramvet,
aliique prohabilicatum parroni) maiorem caurelam adhi-
bendam esse, ad delectum opinionum qua agenda do-
cent, quam quae ad meram disputatione referuneur. Racio
discriminis est aperta, quod in ictis, dum minus probabi-
lis probabiliori poltoonitur, vericulum sic rnius malimi-
nus grauis, nempe Falh aut erroris, qui camen Caluti 2c
bonis moribus nihil noceac; illis duplicis mali, erroris
nempe d peccari, periculum subsit, maxime, si non (0-
lum minus rura curiori, sed eciam minus probabilis, re-
Fiori praeteracui.
Ouod ad opiniones speculatinas actinet, quamuis ex illa
tum delectu arbicrario inus, quam moralium existere
Porest mali; ex si rbique timendum de cauendum eNet, an-
xios nos haberet, e grauistimas molestias, modico Fru-
ctu e incerdum nullo redimeremus, opinionis speculatiuo
probabiles ita de reritare certane, re nulla branium capiac,
quia neutra rincit aperta assecurione reritatis, sed ad il-
lam reraque accedit aliquando eodem oxadu, interdum dif
Pari distant inceruallo. Si a que sint probabiles, libera cAt
veriuluis electio, nisi roco aut praecepeo; rnisis addictus, et
in alicuius Magistri verba iuraueris. Arbicrario huic dele.
Etuitavet, quod ncurra illarum oxinionum rericacem asse.
quatur, neurra careat periculo Fals, reraque ablic ab omni
specie peccati: ergo parum refere veri illarum alleriaS
nisi inera probabilicatis fines, alcera multis parcibus vin-
cac. Innaro enim deliderio ad rerum Ferimur: e si id alle.
qui cerro non datur, propius ab illo abesse oDtamuS; SE
vix d veri concempru exculari posser, is qui nihiil CUTacCES