# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0310
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0310?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 230, page id 1672256038:0310
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=310
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000310.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DFSF. Il: 52C4. lLL:
quaerendum, an rellent ica a luis Medicis cractari, ve i
nus certa remedia ipsis adhiberentur. Vnde alii, dato ante-
cedence, nesam consequentiam, quia inquiune, ratione
Sipendii, cenetur Medicus eligere remedia efficaciora: led
prarer quod, Curari habent eriam lua sipendia, quis cre-
dat, hanc caucelam, auc diligenriam, ofticio Medici, aue
Parochi convenientistimam, exigi porius ratione stipen-
dij, aur mercedis, quam ex charirace, aur iusticia: Alii
dicune, Medicum debere efhcacioribus rei, quia alias ejus
error redundaret in damnum intirmi, quod non est ri
inendum Sacerdoci, quia Crior non imputatur ad culpam.
ratione probabilitatis, qua omnino exculat Contellarium,
_ Ponitentem. Sed praeter quod responsio elt, aperta
Pecicio principii, reijeitur hoc arsumento: consilium illud,
oraue damnuin infere poenicenti, re iam demonstracum
est, hoc ipso, quod a ria rieturis, in CFrOTem, auE in ex
roris periculum inducie. Prarerea, illa indulgentia qua
N.5. Poenicentem eximie a jejunio, ab accentione in reci-
cando officio, Fouet masis concupiscentiam, quam fe-
brem a Medico vinum xsro provinatum: inijcic etiam
graves conscientia remortus; rbi enim primum agnouerit,
in minus probabilem, e curam opinionem, Ce fuisse indu-
ctum, rix pocerit conscientix tranquillitate Frui; erso pe-
riculos sunt illi animarum Medici.
Hoc vlcimum argumencum, erudire prolequitur D.
FaGIANUS NUMETO 293. CONETA AZOF, AragOnium, e Sa-
das; qui ex lese probabilicatum, permitcunt Medico, cum
in prompeu habet remedium cerrius, adhibere illud, quod
probabilius est nocicurum; masis quam protururum, id
ele magis occiturum quam lanaturu: H9c, InquIE, nOn
est curare, sed si dicere verum volumus, occidere. Aeritet
etiam reset Suares, de Sanches; qui cum negent, Medi-
cislicere, relictis efficacioribus, _ certioribus, minus pro-
babilia remedia consulere, id permiecune animarum Me-
dicis, nec purant adstrinsi eadem lege charicaris, ad ani-
macum Calurem curandam, qua Medicos ad Cananda cor-
Poca. Cerreinquie, si cauendum sic à Medico, qui proxi-
nacmedicinam probabilius occituram, quam Canaturam;
quis Ferar Medicos animarum, qui perniciolo consilio, in-
Feranc pociusmortem, quam ricam seruent:
NUMDETO ZTZ. rrget prius argumentum, de Ministris