# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0311
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0311?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 231, page id 1672256038:0311
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=311
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000311.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 38 lines, status machine
# Lines: 38 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

II. CLASS. ARO, ABOEFTC. IVD. EF PRTNC, 23F
Saccamentorum generatim, illis adhibendam esse semper
maceriam cerram, relicta probabili, ex qua posset irritum.
feri Sacramentum, dc ex illius ru, probat contra VaF-
quem, et Sanches, peccari contra reuerentiam in Sacra-
menra; nec posse exculari, nisi siEnCceMaLIUS InCCFEX mate
rix rus, reconularur Calurihominum, cuius causa insti-
cura sunc Sacramenta. De quo cora Disserrarione prims
Patis dictum est.
ARFTCYZYS OYARTYE.
Probatur delectus opinionis pro lese, ab officio LI-
dieis, ee Principis bellum indicentis.
R CYMEM XVM Petitur ab officio Tudicis, qui iB
Lcontrouersis juris, aut facti, debet ferre sententiam,
duxca probabiliorem e turiorem opinionem: ergo erian
quisque nostrum debec in ricae insticutione, sectari par-
cemturiorem. Ancecedens negane Medina, Sanches, ee
alij. Sed probatur racione ex D. Thoma 2. 2. Gualt. 60.
arc. 2. ad iultam iudicis sentenciam, tria Cunt necellaria,
auchoricas, affectus iusticix, ec rectum prudentix dicta-
men. ee haec certia conditio dehcit, A delie certicudo ra-
tionis; quod continsic, L iudex Caruar de his, quae lunE
dubia. Aequi maxime dubium regec, cum opiniones iuris
de facti, lunt xque probabiles, ret cum minus probabilis
anceponitur probabiliori Ergo non porest iudicare ex
equieare, in grariam opinionis minus probabilis; cuno
enim dictamen deductum ex propolitione generaliiuris, de
Particulari Facti, esset certius qualibet praemistarum. Oua-
se sicut omnium Theologorum contentu, iudex peccat, A
ferar sencenciam in gratiam litisantis, cuius causa pacieur
maiora dubia facti, ita etiam ab ofticio iudicis, omnino
aberrabie, sdamnec illum, qui rincie probabilicare iuriss
Nec dicas diserimen esse inter haec duo dubia, quod leges
seacuant, iudicandum secundum alserata e probata, 20
proinde probationes facti, debere esse luce meridiana ela-
liores; de noriria aurem iuris, cum leges nihil praescribane,
censentur relignisse arbierio indicis. Sed rix colerari porele
uxc relpontio: cum enim leses iubenne, in iudices delixe