# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0313
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0313?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 233, page id 1672256038:0313
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=313
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000313.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

II. CF ASS. ARO, AB OPBTO. IVD. ET PRTNC. 255
probabilioriiure, sraris e periculose omnino dicitur, 12-
tionem a Deodatam in iudicem, ea licentia, aur liberca
ce, re ad arbitrium porius, quam exrigore iuris, Catuat,
denegoriis anima lonse gravioribus, et periculolioribus.
iis de quibus lacularium Pribunalia PerHLrCpUNE. Nec re
rius, aue turius est, eo conscientix iudicio, quo habetur
rario parcis minus probabilis, non admicri iniguitatem
illisimilem, qua acceptio perlonarum dicitur: immo, in-
quiE D. FagNANUS ex D. Thoma, MUIEO AFTOCIOE, FerUIM
spiricualium, quam cemporalium adminiltratione perpe.
ETaTUE.
Vlcimum arsumentum, a iure belli indicendi, vrset D.
Fagnanus numero 306. e tribus lequentibus, MeTCOLUS 3.
P. aFT. 18. d Pocelt hac Forma proponi: princeps, dc Respu
blica, in bello indicendo, iudicis perlonam induune, ee
funguntur officio, id que relur in iudicio capitis, si rindi-
canda sic iniuria, ab aduexlario Principe illata, auc qua(I
actione recuperaroria, si aliquod bonum repetendum AE,
in quod belli auchor ius obtendie: Ac neutrum genus belli
juctum esse porest, susceptum ex regulâ probabilicacis,
qua licet aque, aut minus probabilem, cantem pro com-
modo opinionem, contra honeltum, de ofticium sequi:
Ersobellum iustum, debet iniri, secundum probabilio
rem, de curiorem, proiusticis, a eguitare, opinionem:
Deprima specie belli sulcepri, rindicandae iniuria Causa;
omnes Theolosi concedune, masis iniultum esse, quam
sententiam in reum latam, nec conteltum, nec lesitimis
celtibus connictum; quia in causa capitis, probationes cri-
minis, oporter esse Pole meridiano clariores; quid de bello
censendum: ereo illicitum est, nisi aperre constet illatam
esse iniuriam eam que gravissimam.
Hoc aroumento Toannes à S. Thoma, de Lugo, et alii
putane demonstrari illicitum esse bellum, causa recupe-
randi quod Cuum purat esse, qui illud indicie, nisi potiora
de cuidentiora sine, quam aduersarii iura; quia bellum
quacunque ex cansa seratur, habet adjuncca mala infinica,
vindictam, morcem innocentum, rapinam bonorum
Pluraque alia srauiora, quam quae in iudicio capitis, insti-
ouneur reo. Sed Toannes Sanctius, et alii, non putanchac
ratione reselli Cuam opinionem; Ced ex probabilitatum re-
sulis, iutum suscipi bellum, paris, auc minoris probabilira