# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0316 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0316?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 236, page id 1672256038:0316 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=316 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000316.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine # Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.93 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. 23 VISt. IL. SECT. IV nam relcelta Lnecellatia lolicia recam elle percepit, hac duce rericaris, omnem Formidinem dispellic, concemnie qualcunque difficultates, ee aduersae opinionis rationes, qua ab eius alsensu dimouere polluntmentem, huiusmodi coonitionis cuidentis experrem. Inde etiam manifestum Ac, Deum coonolcere hanc rim obiectorum, seu probabi- licarem; non camen posse ea nocicia deduci in altensum il. lius opinariuum, rnde dici porelt Deum cognolcere pro- babilicarem, eiusque rim, quam tamen experiri nequeat, Leu re scholae rerbis reax, nosle probabilicarem in actu si. onato, non in actu exercito. Atque hic locum habet quod Lozici dicunt ex Theolosia, Deum cognoscereentia rario- nis, non Facore; ita probabilicarem reriusque opinionis nouic, non camen illa monetur, aut crahitur in anensum veriusque, rel alterius partis, opinaciuum, qui nedum Deo repuonat, (ed vix etiam connenit perfecto Capienti, d ideo Dlures inalune suspendore assensum, quam de re opinari, cum erroris e peccati periculo, ca maxime parte, quaii- mendum est ne a lese dc officio discedant. Explicata norio probabilicatis, mire illuserat roram hanc concrouerliam, inde enim enidens elt, toro genere differ re, haec duo, qua ridetur contundere Caramuel; iudicaro derei probabilitate, de de se probabili: quam distinctio- nem, corcoie, de cruditistime declarar, de contirmat D. Fa- Onanus num. 230. Primum iudicium, est de probabilicare ipla. alterum, est de vericare, illud certum ett de cuidens, nec Deoindionum, istud incertum, Formidolosum: nihil repuonat, primo iudicii genere, verique parti concradi ctorix, luam probabilicarem alserere, id est, videre verique vim insicam, ad inducendam, in cui assensum mentem, cui Falsicas, de veritas neurrius pareis euidenter comperta est. Ced omnino repugnac, verique parri contradictoria, Simul astencum opinatinum praebere, quod muleis argu. mentis, demonstrat D. Faonanus, eodem loci, e id cui- denter asserie Rriltoreles secundo de Anima de 1. Mecaphysi- Cx. Nunc ad tem HOstTAM. Cerrum est, ex ipso Caramuele paucis, de Forre nulli hominum, Post peccaci orisinalis corrupcelam, fuisse conceltam, aut comparatam euidentem coonitionem, de divinitace, pronidencia immorcalieace animae, de vicimo sine, rera relisione aliisque huiusmodi rebus, 2d Calurem