# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0320
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0320?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 240, page id 1672256038:0320
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=320
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000320.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 44 lines, status machine
# Lines: 44 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

2+0
DESD. IL. SECT. IV.
es: e ex modo dictis porest euidentius, et ralidius con
einci, commencicia esle illa cercitudo Formalis, cui nulla
obiectina respondeat; nihilque differre à Spiritu priuato
haerericorum, inde omnes hius saeculi haereles promana-
runc. Verumque breui demonstio.
Ec primum quideni, hoc argumento, ex Cuperioribus
repeciro, de re probabili possumus duos conceptus forma-
les diltinouere, seu duo indicia efformare; rnum de pro-
babilitare, alcerum de recitare rei, ipsius probabilitari
subiecta. Primum iudicium certum est; e cuidens, nec
DeOrepugnat: Quandoquidem vider probabilicarem seis
id estrim; qua monere porest ad lui assensum; mentem
ionorantia laborantem; alcerum iudicium Formidolosum
elt. Primum accinsit; e quali lambie probabilicatem,
nec quidquam repuonat, cam agnolcere in reraque par-
ee concradictoria; alcerum illabitur in rem, ee assentieur
rni parti contradiecorix; repuonat autem reramque opi-
nari veram, sicur pluribus elegantissime demonstrat D:
Faonanus numero 130. Sed quidquid sit de alcerurro iudi
cio, Ceu probabilicaris, scu reritatis rei; verique respondet
concepius obiectiuus: Fg0 merum tiomentum est Cara.
imuelis, dari cerricudinem Formalem; qua ad nullam obie:
etiuam reFeTAEUE.
Probatur secunda pars argumenti seu minor: probabi-
licas objectiua nihil aliud est, quam vis rei, de qua opi
nandum est, impellens mentem suiignaram, ad assensum
de se Formidotolum, et R eliciatur hic altensus, habet reri-
cacem obiectinam sibi connenientem, nempe rei natu-
tam, quatenus coonoscibilis est, per media non necessa.
Fia. Fr∞Oreerque conceptus, scu certitudo Formalis; sive
de probabilicare; sive de reritare rei, habet obiectiuam,
quae illi ex aduerso respondeat: ac proinde, commenticia
est huiulmodi cerrirudo Formalis, quae ad obiectiuam
nOn referatUE. TIlustrari porest aroumentum; exemplo
luculentissimo. Nesabisne Deo; quod homini concedis.:
vel quod ipsi repurnarribi altumes: at ne Deus quidem,
dere ovinabili iudicium cercum habet, nisi ex cuidenti, de
certa, sei probabilitare, scu ex ri, quam potest exerere,
non quidem in Deum, sed in incellectum ionorantia la-
Borancemi. Vnde rero carepuonantia existie, nili quod
iudicium nullum stare Possit, nili luo obiecto assentiat:
SIC