# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0323 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0323?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 243, page id 1672256038:0323 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=323 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000323.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine # Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.93 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. TII. CLASS, ARO. FX MTAEIS LAXX PROB, 242 fornicionis omnino ignorum, quo eamen mens perfici ruc ad cornitionem: Secundo genere principiorum, qua noca generant noririam, continentur moriua e aroumen- ea, quae nos proinnaca rireure; 2d assensum rei inducune Formidolotum, si probabilia sint, rel certum e necellarium, si cuidentiam habeant. Hlaec rero postrema principia quis non rideat a prioribus, hoc maxime differre, sicut lumen externum objecti, ab innaro oculi, quod sic res rila e co- onita, e simut catio videndi, aliud verosIE, nOn cornica ratio cognoscendi: Hloc exemplo visendam lubiicicimus deceptionem Caramnelis, ec insaniam Ilareticorum hu- sus saeculi. Neque enim diverla reriusque origo, inde om- nino repecenda, quod illa duo genera principiorum de lu- minum, perinde ad menris, sicut ad oculi operationes ne- cellaria, non Catis accurate distinxerint, caque confude- rinc: ee cum oporreac junctim risionem, ee veram incelle. ctionem efficere, nec poslent dissentire citra CrrOTeM, aue deceptionem mentis, illi sejunsune huiulmodi lumina principia dividune, rel puonancia incer se e discordia Fa- ciune. Ouid vero ex illa dissolutione ac distonanciâ, non Possic errorum nasei, cum huiusmodi luminum connenien- eia, veritas constet. Sed novo paradoxo, Caramuel dari Ratuic, cerricudinem ec veritarem Formalem, quae objecti- ad careat; nec ab vilo moriuo, aut principio, quod dici- mus cornitum ee rationem cognoscendi, sed a principio InCOSNITO RCPCTAEuT. Reijeitur tractaru de Ade, Molinx opinio qua objectum Formale Adei, Paltem ex Parte. constituie ipsummet sidei lumen incognitum, id que dis- plicet Theologis, quod accedat ad errorem Hlarecico- tum, qui sux fidei cerricudinem, in nulla moriua ex- terna Scriptura, Fradicionis, sed in ipLaMMCE A. dem; quam primo generi principiorum innotorum repo suimus, in eorum retundant; relim doceatnos C’aramniet, quid illi discriminis incercedat a Calminictis, dum cextitu- dinem, et vericacem Formalem a nullo medio cornico; id est a nullâ cerricdine objectiua repetir; Ouid reronon li- ceat, errorum ee impierarum comminisci, si Cemel consti- cura sic huiusmodi cerricuco, in nullum moriuum, aus Principium conirum refundenda, sed a principio rel in- cognito, rel quod pejus. est nullo hourienda. Flic silto cursum argumenti, quia non rideo, qua pATEC CNATUITUS HE