# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0325
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0325?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 245, page id 1672256038:0325
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=325
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000325.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

YII. CEASS, ARO, PX MALIS L AX E PROB, 245
poris, aliique bonum sibi aliquod allumane, reluri tinen,
ad quem media reterant, aur pocius seiplos per media,
atque ad id duo curanda sint ee cauenda: primum ammo-
venda impedimenta, ee efficaciora media eligenda, quibus
finem consticurum consequamur; deinde enitendum, ne
noua ad consecutionem finis peccara Peu obstacula ap p0-
nantur: hinc sibi opiniones quae hunc ad finem dirigune,
de incendunt curtum, curas dici, ex duplici capire, Peu res-
pectu ad sinem, rel quatenus media peaescribunt necellaria,
duc efficaciora tini comparando: ret secundo, quatenus ca-
VeNE, nC NOVA DCCCatA COmmIELantuE, quae cursum ad A-
nem, et ad Deum praepediant. Licet rem obscurissimam
nouo ec infoliro rerbo explicare: opiniones quae prohi-
DEHENe DCCCaTU COMIEEatuE, quarenus favent legi, de
rebus ex praecepro ad Calurem necellariis, dicimus tutas
esse negatiue, quia scilicet amoliuntur peccata, quxe nOs à
Deo dc a tine rlcimo, longistime abducunt: opiniones re-
ro, quae consulunt media efficaciora ad lalutem, qualis est
rniocum Ecclesia Cacholica, Sacramentorum rus, de alia
id genus; rocamus cutas positine. Ex duplici ergo capite,
lingulis insticuris peccari porest, si omittantur opiniones
curiores, relnegaciue, quae consulunt lesi contra liberta-
tem, quibus si adhaereas, vel minimae rel eriam nullius
Probabilicaris, nullum incurris peccacum, nullum appo-
nis impedimentum ad Dei consecutionem: vel s omit-
tantur curiores positiue, id est quae rradune media effica-
ciora. Differunt plurimum, haec duo genera opinionum
rutiorum; d mirum Cane est, Caramuelem, alio (que opi-
nionum probabilium cusores, illam vel ionorasse, vel ta-
cuille distinctionem: ec rix ab haresi exculari potes, (1
neges illa duo genera tucarum opinionum, rel nulla exce-
pcione, alleras quamlibet probabilem, reroque generetu-
ram esse: multo enim periculosior est, posiciue quam ne-
saciue cucarum contemprus, ac proinde plus malorum
existit, e timendum est, ex repulsa opinionum poltine
tutarum. Et hoc prudencissimé agnouit Suares, ee nega-
vic, licicam esse; acque hinc facile incelligi porest, in re-
mediorum delectu, peccati ex reroque capite: ex primo.
quidem si dentur remedia, qua probabilius Cunt nocitura
quam proturura: ex secundo eciam, E PracermisIS qua
habentur in prompru, remediis efficacioribus dencur de