# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0329
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0329?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 249, page id 1672256038:0329
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=329
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000329.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

TII. CLASS, ARO, EX MALIS LAXSE PROBAB, 245
Ad consirmandum hOC POStLCMLUML AEBUMENEUM, COn-
FerE D. Pagnan. trigelimum quartum Fundameneum, ir ir2
subeilicare, de crudirione explicatum; incredibile est homi-
niconcessam à Deolicentiam, qua placuerir sequendi dua-
rum opinionum, inter se pugnancium. Idem argumen-
cum de religione, non minus apertum, e efticacius quan
de opinione regeri pocest, cum rerique communem pro-
babilicaris carionem concedat Caramvel, sc aliunde disi-
deane oppolitionum maxima, quam concradictoriam vo-
camus, necelle est, illarum rnam in le veram esse, alteram
verotalsam, et a Deo distincte coonosci, eninam veritas
auc falliras insir, a nobis rero ex consenita calixine ignora-
si: hoctamen, cerro constare alterutram esse Fallam, cum
veramque veram esse repugnet opinionem aut religio-
nem, ec ad lalurem idoneam, necellario consequitur, cos
qui reram que consulunt, nullo discrimine verioris, e tu-
cioris, Falsum suadere, sicur qui e duobus poculisruum
reneno infecit, obductis oculis, aut oblitus, cuinam rirus
miscuerit, s verum que sumat, non porest dubirare quin
renenum sic haucturus. Pea qui veramgue ParteIM PTOPO-
sicionum e opinionum contradictoriarum, putar secu-
tam, ee cutam esse, certus est, Fallum ec matum aliqua par-
ce larere, licetignoret quo loco (c: inde infere FagnanuS,
non licere aduocato, rerique parti parrocinari, quia certus
estrni falstarem inelle, ac proinde se iniquam causam de-
tenturum si rerique adlt. Inde etiam ex Silueltro retere
nouam illam doctrinam, qux nullo dilcrimine Hucuet,
veramque partem securam elle, quamuis altera necellario
sicFalla, alienam esse prorlus a Deo, quod non possit esse
rila rarione auchor Falsicaris, neque ad illam materialiter,
aucformaliter inducere, cum sE iplamet veritaS. PFOKTUS
erudira ee subrilis arsumentario, non minus Capiento, et
retigiolo, quam docto auchore digna. Ouid si addas huic
arsumento nostram obseruationem, ee distinctionem, de
adiunsas, nunqua pari Deum contradictorias Xguo macte
puenare, re Facileagnoscunt omnes, nist qui volune de
cipa de perire; siona indubitaca rerioris, aut certe Canioris,
quae scilicet rura sir altero genere opinionum cutaru, aUE
riroque: etsi reriori minus probabilem, negariue a positi-
ve cutiori ancexonas aduerlam; neseio qua rarione apud
Deum, de probos, exculate Possis, adeo praeposterum in