# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0358 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0358?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 278, page id 1672256038:0358 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=358 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000358.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 38 lines, status machine # Lines: 38 recognised, mean confidence 0.92 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. DeSD. II. SECT. V. taces, guarut canes e Deus racionem habet, nec ipEi crediderun uor poste Podesle; ergo iudicium dininum di- verlistimum est a nuperis indiciis Theologorum. Ion de Fuerune Saiili similes probabilicacum exculariones; quas FetCxt MeTCOruS aET. 29. illas tamen Deus non admisic. P A R A B R A PA YS SECYNDYS. Responsio ad areumenta Caramuelis pro sua senten. tia, ex Fna (5 Adami lapsu. TR A est Caramvelis dialectica: quae in illum Mer LVLCOMISIIEOFSIEATGUMENTA, Ex PTOTOPaTentIM PCcCA c0, arripit ad sux caulx patrocinium: ee inde putat, le conticere invictum. Puis probabilicacibus praesidium. Sed non leue est praeiudicium, FaIII, quod rltro agnolcar, quae ex diversis Auchoribus, de Fux e Adami lapsucolligit, nihil sux caulaxe protutura, nisi ponat quali cerca, duo auc eria principia, apud antiquos Parres de melioris notx Theologos, non Colum dubia e incerra, sed pene Fals comperta; unde Facile coniicere est, quas sic inde produ- cturus argumentationes aduerlus nostram sententiam. Primum pro contesso rule haberi, nihil repusnalle iu- Ricia originali culpam renialem, immo re ipsa in earum Dlures, laplum verumque parentum, refert ab Augustino asterrum libro 3. de Libero Arbitrio cap. 5. Xc r. d Fnchiri dii cap. 205. Juxe loca iubet contulere. Sed ad quid: nem- Dere Lector incelligat, rerius esse quam conveniret, quod APologemaris Pa5. 2. dicit, se scripsisse in irinere extra pena- res, nullis auxiliis, cum nec sua ad manum haberet aduersaria quibus adversariis responderet: Quod Facile crediderim, de 12. ailia deessent arsumenta, quibus fidem dictorum Faciat, Plane absoluie opinione Augultino alcripea, de Peccato reniali admisto a protoparentibus, sance innocentia, ex locis duobus ex Auoustino cicatis, quibus ne rerbum qui- dem extat de propohca quastione; rnde agnoscas illum aut neolisentius, aur nimia fidueia hanc disputationem susce Pisse, cum nihil curet incerta d Falla reterre. _c ad illorum examen lectorem. provocare, unde rideat libi defuisse di- digeneiam, aut bonam sidem. uid dCTOTAAIGUMENC