# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0372
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0372?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 292, page id 1672256038:0372
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=372
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000372.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

292
15t. Il. SECT. V
ciliustic, a mabus rntus sesse arguentem, quam au
dacter corripere deliantem.
FIxc paucis de discepratione Pauli cum Petro. Ouid
inde compendii refert pro suis probabilicatibus aduerta-
rius; hinc prirmum probat opinionem in inateria Adei pro-
babilem, exculare à scani errore; quia Perrus ex opinione
Drobabili laplus in materia fidei, excuLatUE ab CFTOLC FOF,
iali, e a morcali peccato. Sed Fallutm est disparationem
hanc pertinere ad Adei materiam; cum tora eset de 20en-
dis, non de credendis; de conversarione, non de praedica
carione, et maxis ex nimio Perri in Judxos affectu, quam
ex prxpostero aur Falso indicio prodiret, sieut nec qui pec-
cac, in exrorem materialem labitur, quia meliora ridet,
probatque e sequitur deceriora. Mulcomasis a vero alie.
num est, quod dicie, assertiones veriusque Apostoli probabi.
les, e ideo simul licieas, nec peccasse Perrum conniuendo
cantisper Srnasosx, quia sequebatur Cuum dictamen pro-
babile, neque Paulum peccasse contradicendo Petro, quia
pro se probabiles rationes habebat. Mira eAt lane conclu-
ho Caramuelis, dum rule contradicentes sibi Apostolos.
beneficio probabilicatum conciliare, sibi contraiticit, om-
nia sus dequemiscet, Apostolos simul ab soluit _ damnat.
Si nihil peccauie Perrus secutus opinionem probatilem.
mencicus est Paulus, qui reprehensibilem pronuntiar; es
ca de causa illi resticit in Faciem: si ne vel minimum pecca-
iic Petrus; qua ratione exculabis ab impudencia, a proca.
cicare Paulum, qui Apostolorum Principem, Cuunque re-
etorem increpauit publice e coram, nihil agentem preter
efficium: Hoc rrum a re relim, putalne tuille plus iurio
Paulo reprehendendi, Cuum, coriulque Eceleliae Paltorem,
a Cencilium converlarione le lubducentem, ex probabili
opinione; ne seandalo esser Iudxis, quam Contellario,
absolucioneni negandi poenicencibus, opinionem sua mi-
nus probabilem; ec cutam securis, atqui Contellarium
damnas peccatimortalis, si abnnat poenicentem absolue-
te: Prso longe granius peccovit Paulus reprehensione Pe-
eri probabilem opinionem secuti, Contellario ob eandem
caulam abfolutionem poenitenti negante: quare indul.
sentior es in Christianorum minimum, quam in eorius Ec.
clelia Capur. Ouid dicam: Caramuel se suis manibus ee
arsumentis contecir, ec iildem exemplis probabilitatun