# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0374 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0374?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 294, page id 1672256038:0374 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=374 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000374.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine # Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.92 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. D+SP. II. SECT. V dincemus pluribus praiudiciis, qua minus opportuna sine aduexlariorum cauillis. PARAORAPHYS. P.R LH, Y 5. TV. Praejudicia ex Antiguis Patribus, e Seri- peoribus, contra probabilitatum securitatem. DR TMTYM RepecO à S. Parrum alristimo hac de re Slen. L eio, quo enidenter demonstratur nouicas, ee lubinde periculum huius doctrina: cerce si ad eam contutandam alix deficerent probationes, Catis eslet, illius apud Sanctos Patres ne restigium quidem apparere; re ex eo cuidens elt, quod nullus a Casuistis ad eam Habiliendam, vel Scripeu- ra, vel Parrum locus afteratur. Pucauit se iltum nodum distoluere aut dissecare Scubrochius duobus rerbis: Ita in- quit, Calmnus Patribus, praeserum Auoustino suos errores affingit, ita Tansenius, alique hujus furfuris hominés. Et Doltaliatandem concludit: Non esse dubium, qu’in San- cti Patres hanc doctrinam supposuerint, vel ipso lumine, maturae notam: nempe humanis actionibus, certam (5) eni- dentem cosnitionem, saepe ac sapius non praelucere. Ita est sed quam ex iis praemissis deducit cum Caramuele, con- clusio, ignora illis prorsus est, ee inaudica, cum rbique clament, in dubiis incertis semper curiorem partem esse elisendam. Ouare illa Scubrochii responsio, SS. Patres supposuisse suam sencentiam, ip (o naturae lumine nocam. necminus cuidentem ex Caramuele, quam hoc axioma currencem moveri, guolibet Aidei arriculo creditu est longe difficilior. Hoc primum praeindicium a silentio S5. Parrum excipie, _E COnATMLAE alEeFUML. Si SS. PatribuS adeO COMPeTTA CTAL haec opinionum probabilium sccuritas, non est credibile adeo tuisse cacos ec solidos, re ab hoc principio per senoro viquam receslorine; e illi contraria, aut minus consenta- nea docuerinc. Si ita sc, cur illis, in morum nesorio, censent recentiores anceponendos, quamuis Fuerint APO. tolis riciniores: Cur dicune difticultates; quae circa mo. res, homine Christiano dionos, CmerOnME, à nouiriis nora veceribus Seripcoribus hauriendas eAe3 APSumen- 34