# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0379 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0379?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 299, page id 1672256038:0379 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=379 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000379.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 32 lines, status machine # Lines: 32 recognised, mean confidence 0.94 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. IV. CEASS. ARG. EX SS. P. PESTTMONTIS. 299 Tuliano retert August. lib. 6. Cap. T. Fecemeriro reprehendi- Ai eos, qui supersedernnt scienda cosnoscere: et Pelagius lib. denatur a et graria cap. 17. Hominem pernisilare debere. ne ienoret; ideoque esse culpandam ignorantiam, quia id homonescit necligentia, quod adhibitâ diligentia seire de- buisset: Erro Synodus damnat quod negabant Pelagiani, quod iple Delasius non est ausus defendere in Synodo Pa- laectina, nempe ionoranciam invincibilem, non quam cumque, sed iuris nacuralis, ad culpam impurari. PluTa congerunt arsumenca cirati authores quibus Carius fuistet relpondisse lemet Scubrochium et Cacamuelem, quam lingulis paginis eos acculare haerelis, nulla probatione al.- laca, nulla Colutione adhibita eorum argumentis, quae ta cilius pucarune concemni polle, quam intringi. Nobis nihil opus est ad ca relpondere, renostram tuca- mur dersu probabilicatum sencentiam. F. sto detur igno- ranciainuincibilis, etiam iuris nacuralis, contra primXe re- sponsionis auchores; demus ignorantiam invincibilem, ex reccato primi hominis consecuram, exculare, et elle incut- Patam; nesamus quod altumit Caramuel, huiusmodi ienoranciam hoc ipso includi opinionibus inter se puonan- cibus, quod rerum de quibus opinamur, cuidens com- Parari aur sperari coonitio nequear, rerx ne sint aut Falla, ac proinde cum nequeant abstersi, ab omni Fallicaris ec ia- licix dubio et Formidine, opiniones, quae stanc pro liberta- te, e commodo, nunquam possune Calua conscientia, et Calure, anceponi opinionibus aque auc magis probabilibus, quae Caluri _ praeceoro Fauent. Aequehocruum hactenus probanimus contra Caramvelem; nec nobis cimendae sunc objectiones Anongmi, quibus CaristaCiCtUS PATA scapho sequenci.