# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0383
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0383?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 303, page id 1672256038:0383
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=383
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000383.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

IV. CEASS. ARC. SOLVT. NODO. XC.
303
Hlanc accularionem gravistimam duplici excipie respon-
Sione P. MrcOTUS. Primum dicie se hunc Casum admi-
sisse disputandi causa, ex aduerlariorum, non ex (ua sen
renria; quia si nesasset hypochelim arsumenti, nempeFOr-
nicationem ex ignorancia invincibili (quam graris admie.
tir, non approbat) Reri licicam, instaurassent ciuldem For-
ma d ris arrumentum, necellario Coluendumi, exemplo
ignorantix invincibilis iuris posiciui etiam dinini, quam
ipsemee Tanlenius concedic innoxiam esse ab omini pecca-
to; reli quis sibi perluaderer ex erronca conscientia, Cacram
Synaxim tempore Paschali praecepto politiuo praeleri-
piam, esse illicicam; ille mereretur s abstineret. Onare
Patius putauie P. Mercorus hypochelim admiteere, ex inen-
readuerlariorum contra luam, e respondere objectioni:
nerideretur difficulcarem effugere. Addic 2. Cc ea (uppol-
tione secucum Diuum Thomam F. 2. Guae st. 29, aFF. 5. Gui
eodem exemplo reitur, illius qui ex errore crederer fusam
à Fornicatione esse malam, ac proinde peccaturum, Si ab
illa abstineret, rarionem que addic; non Polum: Id quod
indifferens est, posse boni, malique per accidens rationem
induere, sed etiam id quod bonum est, posse rationem ma-
li, vel quod malum est, rationem boni accipere a rationis ap-
prehensione 59) indicio; puta, inquic Sanctus Doctor, ab-
stinere a fornicatione bonum quoddam est; CFSO pFOPO-
natur remalum a ratione errance, roluntas crit mala, quia
vultmalum: unde concludic P. NTercOrUS, Se nulla dionum
hac re censura, quae tanti praeceptoris restisia sIE SCCUTUS:
e si Anonimus nequidem S. Thoma relit parcere, Facile
ab illius censura rindicabimus; hoc ad minus Axiomace ab
omnibus recepto, polico rno impossibili consequi duo re-
pugnantia; quare quisquis ex isnorancia invincibili culpa-
bili, implicaretur errantis conscientia dictamine, quod-
cumque ageret, non vacaret culpâ. Sed ne lingula prose-
sequar quae congerit Anonrmus, 2d quae respondet P.
Mercorus, rnum adnotabo in hâc materia lumme obser-
vandum, quo ret hi duo Auchores conciliabuntur, vel ca-
dent objectiones fere omnes, maxime a prima cerrii nodi
vlque ad decimam quartam. Nempe apud omnes fere
Theolosos convenire, ignorantiam iuris naturalis, ab
ionorantia rerum facti vel cuiuscum que iuris posiciui, hoc
maxime disterre, quod illius seneris, card et Fored null2