# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0395 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0395?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 315, page id 1672256038:0395 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=395 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000395.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine # Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. mouere, consulat lector quam sect. 3. tradidi methoduin dispurandi ex probabilibus, qua Adei antecedar authorita- tem, qua cum haereticis; cum Acheis pugnemus, e qua ipla sides detendenda est, non in aroumentum crahenda. Hocnon efficit quam expendimus detinitio, obnoxia con temprui omnium Doctorum, Pracer Forre Catholicos, immonec Cacholici approbabune. Dices has obiectiones cauillos esse, aut ricilisariones, excepta prima, et mala fide noshniusmodi definitionem interprecari: cum obnius sic illius sensus Catis legitimus Nocionem communem opinionis, qu’a humana ee natu- ralis est, his verbis exprimie, quod sic iudicium firmum, grauibusrationibus Fultum; cuius Falsitas nequeat ratio. nenaturali demonstrari, nec illius assensus, auc vlus, ab vilo Capiente improbari; speciarim vero qua opinio pro- babilis est inter Christianos, delignat per convenientiam adtidem, ad Parres, aur falrem per non dissentionem ab illis. Ouid in hae diftnicione sc explicaca desiderari pocest. omnia ad lesitimam distinitionem necellaria: e pluribus vitiis, quam prior incerprecario hac secunda laborat. Coincidicenim hixc explicario cum definitione P. Fabri _ Scubrochii, qui opinionem probabilem definiune, per alsensum prudencem, idest, in defnitione POnunE, qua cumque sune controverla e probanda, quacumque nesantur à Theologis, e Sanctis Patribus. Ouare haec incerprecatio iildem enertitur argumentis, quibus disserrat. I. PeCt 2. Puonanimus contra P. Fabri. Sed non videtur distinguere P. Ferrerius opiniones probabiles (pe- culatiue et practice, pucat opinionem guamcunque re reta Probabilem; coincidere cum cutâ quacunque, lcunesati- ue seu potitiue, qua tamen toro genere differre demon- Ararum est. Nam probabilitas ex le inditterens est, ad re- rum de Faltum, ad bonum malumque, e ideo similem di- rimushederx, qua humiiaceat oporret, et in malum ac tallum Feratur, fere perinde ac nocitia, e consciencia dubis, nih aliquo sustentetur. IIIud rero lerem esse dixi- mus, honectum officium, finem rlcimum, cui quandiu fa- nec probabilis opinio, cura est, id est, carec omni periculo aberrandi a praecepto, a fine, rel a mediis ad Ainem conse. quendum necellariis. Si auchor detinitionis ex illâ, proba- AV. CEASS. ARO, AETA SS. DP, TESF.