# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0403
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0403?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 323, page id 1672256038:0403
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=403
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000403.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

V. CLA5S. ARb. LX RRCVEIS VER. IVRIS. 323
L A R A B A AL L LLYS SECVHDYS.
Ascuratius explicatur regula de poriori jre
possidentis.
Tcer quae hactenus diximus, Caris aperre interpreren-
Locur, et ralide detendant legitimum sen sum harum re-
oularum, et demonstracum sic, Primam ex jure Canonico.
lancire cutioris parris delectum ex praecepto necestarium,
alceram ex iure Cinili de pociori iure polsidentis, nihil ofi-
cere huic electioni: camen cum aduerlarii hanc regulan
vlera iustiria oenus; et indiciale Forum ragari reline, et ad
forum conscientix, omne (que rirrures pertinere, acque in
ea laxicare huius regula, pexcipuum sua caula praesidium
POnAHE, accinsam duo ex D. FaGHAMO, PEIMUI QuOE de
quantas aduexlarii astruane opiniones de assertiones huic
sundamento, deinde quamr debile sic e caducum.
Ouod ad primum acrinet, adeo lace procendune hoc
pollestionis jus Recentiores, re nihil ex illo non diriane
tanguam indubicarum. Inde primum inferune Sanches de
Laginan incertum, sive dubio juris, siuc Facti, an ligacus
ACexCOmMUnICaTIONC, NON debCTE SC CXCOIILUNICAELI
reputare, nec perere se absolui; quia possidet jus commu-
nicandi cum sidelibus, quo dubis excommunicatione nOn
Porelt privari. Idem aAerunE AZOF D Salas, si dubites an
lex Ferens poenam excommunicationis, sc rtu receptas
Idem juris dant Suares ex Sa absoluendi a casibus reserua-
iis sidubium sIC ese FeSerUATOS. Inde etiam PExPOSICUS
nesat, contirenda necellario esse peccata morralia dubia.
exeodem jure polfestionis, Valquez alteric subdicum de-
trectare posse praeceptum Pralati, de cuius legirim à pores
tate aliquod supersit dubium. Inde Salas eximic ab oncre
recirandi officii Clericum incertum, an beneficium quod
possider tenue sII. EX eodem fundaniento Sanches, L ay-
man docene, cum ambisitur an pervencum sit ad mediam
noctem, licere, resci carnibus dic Touis, non Saba-
cho: caulam discriminis afferune à Cua regula, quod dies
louis jus possideat carnes comedendi, quo carear Saba-
chum.
X