# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0413
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0413?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 333, page id 1672256038:0413
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=413
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000413.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

TV CFASS. ARO, RESD. AD RESOL, 8CC.
Sed quidquid sic (neque enim racar lingula expendere
aliud addo, quo relponsum sic generacim rori Caramuelis
resolurioni. Nullum ex his octo exemplis scortim, nec
collectim omnia efficere quod probandum Culcepie;
quidquid sic ex probabili opinione pro liberEatE CONEKA
probabiliorem pro lese, securum esse et immune a peccato.
Neque enim hoc rnquam renic in menrein Cummis Ponti-
ficibus, tantum abese, re in regulam ipsi assumplerinc, aue
in ritae lesem suo nobis exemplo praeseribere Peacuerint:
quasi decsent illis regulae certiores; quas ex iure Canonico
reculius. Fcsi qui Pontificum, illis relictis noux huic de
nuperx adhaesilsene (quod an factum (c, an heri postic int
medio porrnus, nec aslerimus, nec negamus) illud nobis
compertistimum est, e in contello apud omnes else poni
nus, distimili admodum ratione, divers (que regulis admis
nistratam Eccleliam, de lubinde a lesibus immunitares dis-
Penlatas. Ouis nelciat C regorium Magmihabuisse successo-
rem sibi dissimillimu, qui res a se oloriosistime rectas resci-
derit: Fe read Porifices Caculo nostro proxiores reniamus;
quis Alexandrum VI. Panctitare morum, de instâ ac Pa-
pienei Ecclelia administratione aequet Pio V: Cerre qui
paresfacerent Pontilices, ne quidquam pcecasse rilus vi-
deretur, non tam malos omnes purgalle, quam bonos
damnasse vidererur. Et quamuis darem (quod camenx
gerrime a me obtineret Caramuel) aliquorin sui regimi-
nislerem, alsumpsisse raram illam, ee verlatilem proba
bilicacem in reramque partem, id est, perinde in Falsum ac
in verum, in malum ac in bonum; nihil minus rerum cst,
obhuiusmodi regulis abhorruisse Pontitices Sede Apostoli.
ea dignos, quam plures Petri Succellores; ab eius sancti-
care defecisse, servara illius Ade. Si quod camen discrimen
fuerie, rira ex administrationis Pontificum, illa (o ac Per-
nato Cachedrae Perri iure, nullum apertius est, quam quod
praemanibus habemus; de leoum Ponciticiarumi aut dini-
narum servandarum aue relaxandarum cura. Optimi
Principis e Pontificis, id praecipuum ac Fere ruicum mu-
nus est, leges ferre lanctissimas, latas rutari, de uOS, Sub-
dicorumquemores, ad illas componere, nec pari ab rilo
violari inpune, ne sc ipsum, vel alios ab illis eximere: de I
calus aur necessitas ferat, aliquando solui, hoc maluir
comvensari oporrere pari aue majori bono; nec lesibus