# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0417
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0417?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 337, page id 1672256038:0417
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=417
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000417.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

E
IV. CEASS. ARO. RESD. AD RESOL. _CC.
co, genuina imago subiiciatur. Tnutile foret, haec omnia
exempla lare prolequi, e ad sinssula congerere quae pol
Lem curiosa e selecta: ne camen jejunum dimirtam LC
etorem, relim oblervari ad duas clalles haec octo exempla
TCHOCATI; VeL CNIM CONFIMCNE RES TANEUM Ex PFRCCPIO nC
cellarias ad salurem; cuius generis funt eria haec, Polurio à
voco solemini; ab electionedionioris, et a Paltorum reM-
dentia, reliqua quae superfune quinque exempla pertinent
ad rem Sacramentariam, duo ad matrimonium, reliqua
ad Ordines (acros, gux efficacia medii conferune ad Calu-
tem. Micum est, Caramuelem nunquam huius distin-
ctionismeminisse, nisi re illius ignoranciam improperaree
D. Fagnano, qualirerum Theologicarum rudi. Sed pos
sec illi rerius obijci, quod huiusmodi distinctionis aue
ienarus; aut incuriolus, passim, hoc maxime loco graui-
ter impinsat. Neque enim porest dubicare opiniones
Probabiles multominus cutas ese, s rebus efficacia me-
dii quam si ex praecepto necellariis aduersentur, quod illa-
cum ricem ec rim, E absine, nulla probabilicas suppleac, aur
defectum ignorantia exculet; ac proinde inexeusabiles
omnino estent Pontisices, qui nulla huius distinctionis ra-
tione habita. (quamtatmen summe necessariam otmnes ro-
lunE) Sacramenta ex probabiliori sencentia nulla, decerne-
rent exminus probabisi, et cnra esse de legitima.
Sic enim disputo, rel huiulmodi decreca Pontificia, qua
relaxane roca, marrimonia, impedimenta, Poli Ominipo
centix divinx seruaca, ex curiori opinione, immurane di-
vinam insticurionem, gux probabilius cenletur Facere ma-
crimonium earum indissolubile, vel nullum quod initur
intra cognationum oradus lege Molarca pralcripios, quae
necellariam impositionem manus a cribus Epilcopis, rni
creando requirit; vel huiumodi institurionem dininaur
illaesam relingune, quid ad hoc nostrum dilemnia respon
Turus sic Caramvel, prorlus ignoro. Si dicat, decreris Pon-
cificiis immutaram diuinam insticutionem, omnia Aidet
et Theolorix fundamenta connellie, et poreltarem rni
Christo eximiam; Sacramenia condendi, auc immutandi
hominum Cubiicie arbitrio, ex privilesio probabilicacums
Si alteram partem eligac, e relic insticurionem Sacraimen:
eorum nulli Ecclesix porestari subiici; viderie quo fundat
menco, non solum asserat, sed obiiciat nobis, Cacrametes