# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0426
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0426?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 346, page id 1672256038:0426
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=426
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000426.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

340
DISe. II. SeCT. V.
semur, ee in Correm divinam tranleamus, dispari quak
rnionum ec cognationum gradu: Aeque re ab humanis
exemplum Cumanus; quandoquidem roci ris in hoc polica
et, re Deonosconsceret, ee in illius cransterar porecta-
cem; distinouendi Cunc rarii huius mancipationis gradus
iis non dissimiles, quos iuris conlulti de rerum renditione
constiruune: Sicur agri fructus Colene incerdum vendi,
Seruaro iure dominii e propriecaris in agrum, incerdum
ages plenoiure in emprorum cransie, ec pracer plura, qui
bus distane haec duo genera convencionum, hoc maximé
differune, quod agex oppigneratis rni Fructibus, vendi
Pollit alreri ralide, quamuis inique, s cedat in noxam em-
Peori. Fructus; peracta vero Cuperiori rendirione, nulla
impolterum ralide rentari porest. Ouid repugnac, aur quid
mali habet, Sinildem gradibus rocum lolemne à simplici
dictet, s iscud oppioneret Deo Fructus castiraris, illud
aocum a corpus, rnde existune, in illius mancipet pore-
ltacem e obseguium: Poque dilcrimine constituro, illici-
ea non invalida lune, qua a reo rori simplicis incuntue
marrimonia, nulsa vero quae rocum solemne sequuntur.
nihilo minus quam rendicio post rem omnino aliena-
C3I. Si ita distinguas rorum Colemne à simplici, reliqua
Quali data porta ruunt. Dorem hanc singularem habee
doctrina D. Thomae, guae ilsi merico Anselicae nomen com
Parauie, quod Ansclorum more, omnia rno complecta
tur, omnia in ruum resoluat, ee ex rnoerahat. Dileimi
ne polico incer haec duo genera vororum, reliqua veniune
consecutione necessaria. Ouod ad primam qualtionem
aeciner, an possibile sic huiulmodi discrimen rocorum, nul-
lum axbieror, adeo rerum Theoloricarum rudem, qui
hoc in dubium renocee; nec puro lonse abesse ab haeresi
Caluinistarum, qui omnia vora uno baptismo irrita Reri
docene, ri de plenecudine, re dicune, dominii, quod rege-
nerationis sacramento innos DeO COmparatuT.
tlinc ad secundam quaectionem progredior an conve-
niac. Nesabic Forre aliquis, quasihoc consecrarionis, de
mancipationis genus oblic, communi omnium Christia-
norum bapeismo factae e Sacerdorali ordinationi: quasi
aior sic quam addic rorum Colemne. Quod ad primam
comparationem spectar ex baptilmo, monuihaeresim Cal-
ministarum resixere, qui non dissimili arsumencatione, in