# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0437
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0437?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 357, page id 1672256038:0437
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=437
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000437.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Hlac ordine pausesunt plapolleto, de gravarum actioni-
bus, breuius dicta sinc, re fusius retellamus alteram argu
mentationem, a probabilibus diuerlorum generum inter-
pretationibus. Purarne Caramuel, perinde sensus Scri-
Peurx ad licceram rarios inter le pugnare, aut cum inter-
precacionibus Moralibus. ec Anasogicis, ac opiniones, qux
nesant, ec aftirmant, licere aequivocarionibus, ee restri-
ctionibus Fucare reritarem, qua praeceptum amandi Dcunm
incerdum, aur ad minus semel per cocam ricam collunE
vel astruune : Si huinlmrodi opiniones aequiparet interpre-
cationibus Scripcurx probabilibus, de relit parem rbique
concordiam, aut pugnam, e omnes perinde innoxias,
duc periculolas, convellit omnia Scripturx e Theolooix
fundamenta. Si id pudearFareri, ad quid ista consccurio,
curae sunc ciusdem loci Scripturae interprecariones rarix,
quae ad mores, ad sensus Anasoricos, e incerdum ctiam
ad licreram perrinent: erso idem sentiendum est, de qui-
bulcum que opinionibus inter se delegc, de lalute puonan-
cibus: Nego ee perneso consequentiam, nit huic com-
Pacacioni aliguem modum adhibeas, CIIMS SenCLIS LUINE
quos subjunso.
Sieut Origenes Pessime audic, quod interprecationes
Scripturx Morales, Analosias, relit pronecessariis haberi,
e licrera sensum debilitet, aue ollat. Caulatus, quem pEX-
ferune rerba Scripturae sensum, difficillimum esse, ee ab
omni specie reri alienum, ac proindemolliendum ese A-
nalosiis: ita non longe ablunt ab Origenis licentia, vel
Docius haeresi, qui legem diminam obscuram, difficilem, ar-
duam rbique clamane, ac proinde benignioribus interpre-
cationibusleniendam, et rejusum illud leuc Aac, tutam
esse quamliber opinionem, quamuis probabilius a vero
sentu legis dissentientem; quamdiu aliquid (uperexiE PrO-
babilicaris, quo Fallitas _ error regatur. FToc sertisime
denuntio, minus sibi permisisse Origenem ludere Analogiis
in Fideimrsteria, quam Caramuelem probabilicatibus in
legis dininae PrXCepTA.
Addo. lpodate d coriparucioa
hoc Cenu; Scur Scripturae incerprecationes cuiuscumque
generis admieri, et probarinihil recat, l reiles sint ad pie-
catem, nec sinr à genuinâ ex licrerali alienae, neque cum il-
la DiDhabilius pugnenE: ita parias, securicare trui qualcum.
IN. CEASS ARCDEMCNL MECS