# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0438 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0438?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 358, page id 1672256038:0438 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=438 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000438.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine # Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.91 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. 1.s paracionem eamas, pou Cat incerprecationibus Scripcurae, Laceot, Lesmum elle arsumentum, quo fun- damenta Theolosix Carainuelis evercuneur: e si iplamet Auoustini incerprecario de operibus sex dierum, probabi- lius dissentiac à concextu scriprurae, non detendam quasi ad licreram, sed dicam esse Anagosicam, e exculabo (0l3 in S. Doctorem seuereriâ. Si ira agi secum et iplemet Augu. Rinus boni consuleret, de rnius loci Scriprurx interpreta- tione, qua videtur à genuino liccerx sen su probabilius ab- ese; quid de Caramuele, quid de recentioribus Theologis dicarti, qui ab Auoustini authoritace, e reverentia remo- cistimi, quod illi semel indulcum pro beneficio reputaret, jure Cuo allumane, non licere nobis, citra grave remericaris noxam e Forre cirra mortale peccarum, cutas nesare, quas quoridie cudune opiniones; quamuis Fateaneur probabilius legi divinx repuonare e minus illi esse consentaneas, quam rexrui Geneleos incerprecationem Auoustini de opere sex dierum: Pane si rbique Augultinus, sicur eo loci à proba- biliore sen su Scripturx ad licreram recestilset, codem quo Origenes loco reponeretur, e rix haerelis nocam eftugeret. Ouidisitur de aduerlariis sacuendum; quimajorilicen- eia, leres divinas e humanas incerpretantur, e pro indu. bicaris haberi rolune opiniones, gux probabilius Legislato. rismentem corrumpune: Non dubico quin Caramvelem Daeniceat, hoc exemplum incerprecationum adhibuisse; inde cancam suis probabilicatibus ruinam iMPOEca UIE. Sed re compararionem illi perniciolam, veilem nobis elaudam, obscruatione superioribus nihilo inferiori. Opi- niones probabiles de agendis, e quo iure admicterem, cum incerprecarionibus scriprurxe, nisi diversissima esser illarum ratio, hocmaxime nomine, quod incerprecationum laris. Smus SE rsuS, e Si qua minus licrerae consentiac, postie sine rila noxa veritatis ec legis, renocari ad genera, diverla quidem, sed non aduersa licrerx de rerirari, et ad sensus orales Anagosicos, cum reilicate maximâ de progressu charitaris. Opiniones rero morales in rlum reuocandae, auxe rem re dixi ad vinum SCCaNE, OpOEECE veraS elle auE alsas, lesi consentoneas aur aduexlas. Quare, nisi relio D2SP. TI. SECF. VI. que opiniones probabiles, guanua non fueriexque ul maxis probabile, a vero legis senlu recedere. Si ita com-