# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0441 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0441?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 361, page id 1672256038:0441 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=441 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000441.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine # Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. IV. CLASS. ARO. DE MENTE PHEOL, _EC, 36F qui Contellarium damnat peccati mortalis, i poeniten- rem secutum opinionem probabilem, recuset absolue- re. Ouid enim D. Bernardus. Rectene, inquie, (a- puerine, ipsi riderinc. Onare immerico concludit Cara- iuel, sc e caeteros Doctores, hodie Deo e mundo latis- facere, si in practicis Faciant quae poltune; ec in speculati- nis scribane, quae post sudium ex diligentiam debitam, ta- tionabile credane. Exculacio planc in peccarum rerrenda. qua rarione dicis, ec in practicis Pacere quae possis, dum adhares opinioni minus probabili, proroluprace e com modo: quasinon ribi lic obnia, quali in placeis non clami- cet, de ce rocet opinio pro lege probabilior, e vna nega- tive ac posiciue ruta? Et dumhac neolectâ, alceri scribis esle adhaerendum, nonne in re cadic illud Fuanselii rer- bum: Si caecus caece ducarum praestet, ambo in foueam cadunt Ouod ex eodem libro subjunsir sextum argumentum, de exemplum nihilo magis superioribus, caulam probabilica- cum junat: imo qua D. Bernardus haber, ridentur scri- Pea aduersus Carammelein, nam qui probabilitates CapranE, carpit rerbis Prouerbiorum 18. Occasionem quarit qui vuls recedere ab amico: quales non delune rnquam probabi- licacum culoribus ec sudiolis: neque iis destituebantur, ad quos scribebat Carnorenses, qui electionem relcindi ee abrogari rolebane, quali irregularem: e licet, inquit D. Bernardus, de ea coram Deo non dubicetur, coram ho- minibus tamen, aur rix aut nullarenus connincieur; FrgO rerimque, ec proillâ, ee in illam, involutam _ inTOLtaM ve aic Bernardus, aroumenta probabilia suppetebanto Ouid ex luis regulis ad hoc dixisset Caramuet: PFOn- tiasser curri amico Diana, licem verimque fore iultaim, de ad arbirrium posse judicem ferre sencentiam, ec rni clien- cum rendere, e li res non esset indinidua, partiri inter licisances, e ab verisque pecuniam emungere. AC COn Era D. Berirardus, ratus rerimquerem dubiam e probabi- lem, jus tamen porius esse electi, quali poselloris, ita pro- nuntiat: Onomodo vos irrecularem diciris electionem, quae cassari reculariter non valeat, aut reprobari: Equidem le- situr, quod probari non porest, mihi infectum est. L.X D. Bernardo, non censetur res probari, qua paribus verim e argumentis munitur: et s res eo loc0 sL, Aandum