# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0442
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0442?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 362, page id 1672256038:0442
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=442
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000442.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

iubet, Pro parre curiore, seu proiure postidentis, e clectii
e qui licemoet, dcecconet irricam esse rule, incur-
rie in reprehensionem Capienris, ee quaerit occasionem, rt
ab amico secedar.
Adeo ignoca, aur reproba est antiquitati, securitas
probabilicatum, contra legem, re hactenus repertus sir
mullus locus ex Parribus, quo hac de re mentio hat, quin
aPCFEe _ exerre damnetur. Argumento sinc duo locaD.
Bernardi à Caramvele citara adeo luculenca, re probabili-
cacum damnationem non potuerir ettusere Caramuet, nili
adhibita diltinctione veritatis formalis (6 virtualis; atque
hancpostremam, rule inesse opinioni probabili, quan-
cumuis sic Falla, quia perinde se habet, ee exculac, ac 
vera eet. Nihilo videtur melior ilta relponsio, quam S3.
cramentariorum quos, dum risent Cacholici expressis
Ccripturx _ Patrum locis, quae praesentiam Corporis
Christi reram astruune, sub speciebus Fuchariltix, haec
omnia excipiunt ec eludunt, putant que le reuera elidere, de
intringere, eadem distinctione Caramvelis, mutato rna
verbo reriratis in praesentiam, quam volune duplicem
nacuralem, e rircualem per Adem, illam longistime lemon
vene ab Fucharistia, iltam propuonant, quia side quallore
dicunt se Christi Corpus excipere praelentistimum rirtuali
pealenciâ, quia perinde reile est, e eficax ad lalutem, ac
Si reipsa Corpus Christi adesset, e ore lumeretur. HIoc
rno differe Caramvel a Sacramentariis, quod semel can-
rum in Controuersia de Fucharistia, hac distinctione le
muniane, ille passim adhibeat; e cum probabilicarem, seu
rirtualem illam vericarem, Formali conspicux, de cuiden-
ei opponat; hanc vero nullo loco relic consictere: quid
inde consequitur: Probabilicarem rbiquerasari, et re-
gnase: e cum ex Caramvele, quidquid partem vIam PFO.
babilem facie, aduerla Faucac, ee probabilem, ac proin-
de securam consticuacl; cum probabile, ec securum in-
dividua sint, aur prorlus eadem, omnia seclusa cuiden-
eiz, qua Phoenice rarior ek, hinc inde probabilia cuta
unE S honesta. Maleisitur damnar Carnorenles D. Ber-
nardus, male Luspendie iudicium, quo absoluendi erane
D. Cregorius d D. Auonstinus; quandoquidem non decrar
illis probabilicas, idelt, securitas, idest, vircualis veritas,
dest, honestas formalis, quamuis forre deesser objectiva
16
DESD. II. SECT. VI.