# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0453
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0453?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 373, page id 1672256038:0453
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=453
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000453.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

P. Fabri, L. Ferterius, d Scubrochius, nullam adMIETUNE
opinionem probabilem cucam, nisi cerro d cuideneer sE
probabilis, e illarionis necellarix. Tamburinus vero, Ca-
tamuel, Sanctius, censent ad securitarem laris esse, illa-
eionem elle probabilicet probabilem. Hlinc etiam habemus
secundo, clarius de distinctius explicata, quae ex Delug0,
D. FagnanO, e P. Mereoro reclimus, discrimina incer
indicium, et altensum probabilicaris, seuillationis, de indi-
ciun probabile, de re illata: manifectum enim est, illud
necestarium esse, euidens, Deo nihil repuonare; alterum
rero de re illaca, involuere defectum, qui omnino repu-
snetmenti, rei conspicuam habenti veritatem. Ifinc eciam
elucet aliud dilerimen lumme nocandum, probabilicatem
convenire Polle propolicionibus ee opinionilius contrarie,
aut contradictorie pugnantibus, e posse nos alsentiri cer-
coiudicio, illacioni omnium re probabili: Sed de rebus ip(is
Ellacis, simulopinari reras esse ee Fallas, omniso contradi
corium elle.
Hinctertio colligere est, reristimum este, quod ex C a-
Aropalao reculimus; opiniones probabiles, non polse ad
prarim renocari, scu rurpari in regulas Adei, et morum,
nis alsensum praebeamus, non Colum illationi, sed eciam rei
illata, sive re erudire loquitur ciratus Author, non Polum
habeamus indicium certum de probabilitare rei, sed ad mi-
nusprobabile, dehonestare, et rericace illius. Nam alias
Deus, qui habet iudicium de probabilicare, Posset duci opi
nionibus probabilibus, quod hactenus inaudicum est.
Trinc eandem concludimus, Aduerlarios in haC COnErO.
versa, perpetu â aequivocarione agere; qua maxime labon
tat Caramvel hoc argumento. Cum enim disputandum
sic de probabilibus, non quoad illarionem, aut consequen-
ciam, sed quoad consequens, ex rem illatam, cuius assen-
sus, e iudicium quericur, an possir licire, de ruro altumi in
resulam, quam seguamur: illi ab rno senere, in aliud
abcune, e praerermisso altensu reiillarae, tori sunt in aNensu
illationis prxedicando e rrsendo. Vitium illud occulcis-
mum, manifelcum Ac, exemplo quod praemanibus habe-
mus. Imidmagis a vero alienum, quam quod perluade-
ce rule Caramuel, quorquor fuere D. Thoma Amulos an-
ciquos e recentiores, rnam in D. Thoma, reipleloqui
cur, probabilioritarem impugnasse, non probabilicarem
A a 11
IN. CL15S. ARO. DE D. BRTOTETA XC. 375