# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0458 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0458?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 378, page id 1672256038:0458 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=458 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000458.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine # Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.92 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. 39C 151. LL SECF. V. I. srecu APationu: Led distulerim ad Anem; _ qua cumque praemisimus, necellaria exiltimem adillorum in- cerprecationem; nec me laborum poenicebie, si senlun Sanctistimi Prxeceptoris detur assequi, ee aliquam lucem divina eius doctrinae afferre. Cum Caramuel velitare porius aduersus D. Fagnanum Ratuerit, quam insto peaelio decerrare; nec aliunde curet, quid sentiar D. Thomas dehis rebus, quxe ad mores perti- rent; ee ab illo passim recedar, Dianam cuilibet antiguo- TUM XGUEE QUE FOFEC anCCPONAE; à D. Fhome Hlictoria, non a scripris, ec doctrina allumpsc, que Coluimus argumenta: ac proinde nulla nobis cum illo concertatio incunda est de mence D. Fhome: Ced eius loco luccedune duo acerrimi Scriptores Anonrmus, _ P. Ferrerius, qui a nobis dissen- riunt, nec inter se melius conveniune, led exrremis senten- eiis adhaerent. Anonrmus quidem negar, vel rllam dari iuris nacuralis ignoranciam invincibilem, quia illud jus, est quasi ad portam, ec in prompru, capru facile, quod per- Petuo lucer, de rix extinsui, aut detineri porest, nilcOn cupiscentix errannide, cui resiltendum est cuilibet rationis compori: e l huic delic officio, imputandum est illud pec. cacum: nec ignorancia, quae inde conleguitur, dici debet invincibilis: rel si demus ica appellari, nesar secundo ex- culare a peccato, quamcum que opinionem Fallam, legi nacurali repuonancem: et hoc pro cerro dogmare Adoi habet, quod B. Ansustinus propuonauir aduertus Pela- ianos. Ouare illum malehabet, quod P. Mercorus Cuam Balim his duobus fundamentis, maxime secundonon al etuxerir: rnde putat nucare se labi: e hoc coris viribus demonstrandum suscipie, ab objectione r4. vlque ad 24. XiAinem lua censurae: quibus omnibus pari subtilicare, ec eruditione re(pondet P. Mercorus Apologia Ticini edica. Ex veroque aliqua seligemus, ad illustrandam mentem D. Thomae, in graciam illorum quibus non est copia illius relponsionis: ec inde agnolcet tacile eruditus Lector quo turbine Anourmus torquent hastam, ee quantus etiam in Clypenme assisreat P. MLCFCOLUS. AF P. Ferrerius a men. ec Anonrmi alienus, movet diuersum belli genus, et con- rendic ex S. Thomâ, aliisque antiquis Theologis, cutas ese opiniones vere probabiles, quamuis falsas, ee legina- curali aduet CaS. DNOS ITeF haS dUaS exFTeMaS, MedIA.