# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0473 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0473?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 393, page id 1672256038:0473 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=473 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000473.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine # Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. IN. CLA5S. Ld R6. DE MENTED. LEOM F. 393 dacur; accingo ine examini secundi Copitis, quo conti- netur quaestio, quae ad hunc locum pertitet, de verâ men- ce D. Thoma. Orditur ab expostularione de nonnullorum morolitare, ac concumaciâ e superbia, qui in torum in- quit, probabiles opiniones damnant (quod nulli puto rinquam in mentem renisse) ec contemnune, atque exe- Crantur, canquam inventum, nuperum e periculotum cum tamen necessarium sit Theologix Morali, e omnibus Eaeculis receptum. Neque dissimilis elt haec Theolosia ParS dogmatica: reraque constar duplici assertionum genere. nempe indubitaris _ probabilibus: et has postremas addie regnare in Theologia Morali, quam si relis exisere ad demonstrationum euidentiam semoris probabilicatibus non eris aquior, quam si à Machematicis submoucas de- monstrariones, contentus arsumentis ex probabili- buS. Denique, quid opus pluribus: cum perpetuus sIcmOS omnium Theologorum, nouas cudere opiniones probabi- les, eriam pro reilitare delibertare, ee Pemoris acque anri- ouaris opinionibus cncioribus, nouis securicacem conci liare. Eehoc contirmarur illustri cestimonio S. Anthonini com. T. Parrisprimae, ciculo certio capire r0. Paragraph. 20. vbi habet, contrarias esse opiniones inter DoctOres Cancticare de Scientia maximos, in maceria morali, criam ad salurem necellariâ, monstrari exemplis; quale est illud D. Thomae de dilatione Confessionis. Addi porest aliud de vnitare actus Concricionis: nam D. Bonaventura, post Flusonem a Sancto Victore, censer hominem in pecca- cum mortale laplum, peccare sdata copia Contelarii dif- ferat contireri e conteri, nihilo minus quam furem dila- cione relticutionis rei ablatae: nec remicri peccata nis Praeuia singulorum derestarione distinctâ. Nihil camen horum arguimenca ioratus S. Doctor, relictâ opinione curiore, contirmat minus curam, ec Forre minus probabi- lem, ec eximit ab omni peccaro leram poenicentiam, seu dilationem Confectionis; aeque rnico Concritionis actu, docet retractari e deleri omnia peccata; Ergo ip(eS. Do. ctor nouis opinionibus contra lerem securitatem compa- rauic. Onidni eriam idem iuris habeane alii Theologi3 Duibus capice 3. vindicar authorirarem conciliandi suis opinionibus probabilicarem curistus dam, etiamsiantiqui et