# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0479 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0479?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 366, page id 1672256038:0479 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=479 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000479.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine # Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.93 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. TI. CE105. ALRG. DE MEASE D. THOME. 366 cendx causa, postpolirâ opinione tuta, non Colum negati- ue, led eriam posiriue, ille censetur imprudentissime, a0c- re:neque potelt exculari, quod subsit probabilicas opinio- ni quam sequitur par aur minor probabilicaci opinionis prolese d lature stancis. Regui res nostrae eo sune catu, re proximum insit per se periculum peccati, annerum opi. nioni qua Faver libertari contra legem: Ergo impruden- cistime agic, qui sententis pro lege poltpolica, alceri ad- hareaE. Si dicas, probabilicarem exculare; quia idem est cum iudicio prudenti. Scd praecer quod haec responsio, est per- verua pecirio principii, multis argumentis Fal connicta, meminisse oporret quod ex ToanneMajore retertur pagina 73. Propcer hominis ignorantiam, introductam else opi- nionum pluxalicatem post primi parentis peccacum: ve nostrum scire, acignorare compararum, nihil HF; aC pFO- inde discordiam opinionum probabilium proficisci a pec- caco orioinali; ve mirum sC, arboris adeo peltiterae non Tolum innorios elle Fructus, sed eriam esse reluri cornula- luris; et sieur de Rinocerore dicitur, Si cornu incinsar Fon ei renenaro, aquas purgare, ita ionorancia auc probabili- tare, quod perinde est (cum praecipuum illi ab ignorancia sic praelidium, ee a rei inenidentia) quolcumque actus legc Prohibitos, ab omni pecearo, ee iniquitare mundari, et esse Peaelencissimum remedium, quo omne peccari periculum aECCatUE: cum camen nihil nisi rolupcaris se commodi amor, ad hunc actum cogac, et duo auc eria suppetant re- media, nempecellatione ab actu, quem probabilius est aduersum esse legi, et electio opinionis pro lese can- tis. Si quis in binio aur criuio politus, sciat duas rias curis- simas esse, ee a cerria tancum periculum larronum ti- meatuE; quis excuset cum, qui securicarem sibi e aliis Polliceatur, hanc postremam securis, duabus superioribus Praetermissis: Flinc retellitur objectio insinvara pasina 50. actum quem probabilius est essemalum, d lesi aduerlari, proba- bilicare sententia oppolitae heri cancum materialiter ec ob- jectiuemalum, non Formaliter. Pollet Forre locum habe- re haec distinctio, si necessitas hunc actum macerialiter ma- lum extorquerer, non reilicas, aut rolupras ad illum alli- ceret. Deinde, l non desinat ellemalus ex adjuncta du-